From: Greg KH on
2.6.33-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.

------------------

From: David S. Miller <davem(a)davemloft.net>

[ Upstream commit 211a0d941b1924e667483f822a55e2cc694cd212 ]

When the PCI pool changes were added to fix resume failures:

commit 98468efddb101f8a29af974101c17ba513b07be1
e100: Use pci pool to work around GFP_ATOMIC order 5 memory allocation failu

and

commit 70abc8cb90e679d8519721e2761d8366a18212a6
e100: Fix broken cbs accounting due to missing memset.

This introduced a problem that can happen if the TX ring size
is increased. We need to size the PCI pool using cbs->max
instead of the default cbs->count value.

Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem(a)davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh(a)suse.de>

---
drivers/net/e100.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/drivers/net/e100.c
+++ b/drivers/net/e100.c
@@ -2854,7 +2854,7 @@ static int __devinit e100_probe(struct p
}
nic->cbs_pool = pci_pool_create(netdev->name,
nic->pdev,
- nic->params.cbs.count * sizeof(struct cb),
+ nic->params.cbs.max * sizeof(struct cb),
sizeof(u32),
0);
DPRINTK(PROBE, INFO, "addr 0x%llx, irq %d, MAC addr %pM\n",


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/