2.6.34-rc5: Reported regressions from 2.6.33
in [Kernel]
|
Prev: x86: Do not write to VGA memory space if CONFIG_VGA_CONSOLE is undefined
Next: error at compaction (Re: mmotm 2010-04-15-14-42 uploaded
From: Rafael J. Wysocki on 20 Apr 2010 00:20 On Tuesday 20 April 2010, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 05:15:57 +0200 (CEST) "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw(a)sisk.pl> wrote: > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15812 > > Subject : utsname.domainname not set in x86_32 processes (causing "YPBINDPROC_DOMAIN: domain not bound" errors) > > Submitter : <adi(a)hexapodia.org> > > Date : 2010-04-19 21:28 (1 days old) > > I merged hch's fix for this twelve seconds ago. I updated the entry. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
From: Nick Bowler on 20 Apr 2010 10:00 On 05:15 Tue 20 Apr , Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.33, please let us > know either and we'll add them to the list. Also, please let us know > if any of the entries below are invalid. Please list these two similar regressions from 2.6.33 in the r600 DRM: * r600 CS checker rejects GL_DEPTH_TEST w/o depth buffer: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27571 * r600 CS checker rejects narrow FBO renderbuffers: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27609 Thanks. -- Nick Bowler, Elliptic Technologies (http://www.elliptictech.com/) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
From: Andrew Morton on 20 Apr 2010 00:00 On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 05:15:57 +0200 (CEST) "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw(a)sisk.pl> wrote: > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15812 > Subject : utsname.domainname not set in x86_32 processes (causing "YPBINDPROC_DOMAIN: domain not bound" errors) > Submitter : <adi(a)hexapodia.org> > Date : 2010-04-19 21:28 (1 days old) I merged hch's fix for this twelve seconds ago. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
From: Ben Gamari on 20 Apr 2010 22:10 On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 05:15:57 +0200 (CEST), "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw(a)sisk.pl> wrote: > This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.33, > for which there are no fixes in the mainline known to the tracking team. > If any of them have been fixed already, please let us know. > > If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.33, please let us > know either and we'll add them to the list. Also, please let us know > if any of the entries below are invalid. > I have recently reported this suspend regression on my Dell laptop hardware. References: http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/4/18/20 Bug-report: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15820 Thanks, - Ben -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
From: Jerome Glisse on 23 Apr 2010 06:30
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 12:57:58PM -0400, Nick Bowler wrote: > On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 07:15:38AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Tuesday 20 April 2010, Nick Bowler wrote: > > > Please list these two similar regressions from 2.6.33 in the r600 DRM: > > > > > > * r600 CS checker rejects GL_DEPTH_TEST w/o depth buffer: > > > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27571 > > > > > > * r600 CS checker rejects narrow FBO renderbuffers: > > > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27609 > > > > Do you want to me to add them as one entry or as two separate bugs? > > As upstream doesn't consider the first to be a kernel issue, I guess you > should just list the second. > > On 10:57 Wed 21 Apr , Jerome Glisse wrote: > > First one is userspace bug, i need to look into the second one. > > ie we were lucky the hw didn't lockup without depth buffer and > > depth test enabled. > > OK, if the failure is due to userspace is doing Very Bad Things(tm), > catching that seems reasonable. > > Nevertheless, even if it happened by luck, the result was (ostensibly) > working programs that suddenly break once one "upgrades" to the latest > kernel. If userspace can't be fixed before 2.6.34 is released, perhaps > a less cryptic log message would be appropriate? > > -- > Nick Bowler, Elliptic Technologies (http://www.elliptictech.com/) I pushed fix into mesa for the depth issue i will look into the other one today and likely push kernel fix. Cheers, Jerome -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ |