From: Roger on

Hi,
I have an Access database with attachment data type enabled, as users are
uploading pdf's and other documents, I am afraid they will fill the database
(2GB) very quikly.
What are my options to resolve this?
Is there a way to continue using Access? do I need to Migrate to SQL? (does
SQL fix the problem? does it handle attachment data type?)

I wish there was a way to archive those attachements!

Regards
Roger


From: PieterLinden via AccessMonster.com on
Roger wrote:
>Hi,
>I have an Access database with attachment data type enabled, as users are
>uploading pdf's and other documents, I am afraid they will fill the database
>(2GB) very quikly.
>What are my options to resolve this?
>Is there a way to continue using Access? do I need to Migrate to SQL? (does
>SQL fix the problem? does it handle attachment data type?)
>
>I wish there was a way to archive those attachements!
>
>Regards
>Roger

Upsizing is one option. Then use Access as a front end. Requires some
rewriting, though, because SQL Server has features that Access doesn't...
Otherwise, you would have to store the files in a directory that everyone has
access to and then use hyperlinks.

--
Message posted via AccessMonster.com
http://www.accessmonster.com/Uwe/Forums.aspx/access/201003/1

From: Roger on
Thanks Pieter for your reply,

Does SQL have Attachment data type? I tried to do a test migration into SQL
the end result was that the attachment never came through into the SQL
database!

Regards
Roger

"PieterLinden via AccessMonster.com" <u49887(a)uwe> wrote in message
news:a5c4c3098facf(a)uwe...
> Roger wrote:
>>Hi,
>>I have an Access database with attachment data type enabled, as users are
>>uploading pdf's and other documents, I am afraid they will fill the
>>database
>>(2GB) very quikly.
>>What are my options to resolve this?
>>Is there a way to continue using Access? do I need to Migrate to SQL?
>>(does
>>SQL fix the problem? does it handle attachment data type?)
>>
>>I wish there was a way to archive those attachements!
>>
>>Regards
>>Roger
>
> Upsizing is one option. Then use Access as a front end. Requires some
> rewriting, though, because SQL Server has features that Access doesn't...
> Otherwise, you would have to store the files in a directory that everyone
> has
> access to and then use hyperlinks.
>
> --
> Message posted via AccessMonster.com
> http://www.accessmonster.com/Uwe/Forums.aspx/access/201003/1
>

From: Tom van Stiphout on
On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 17:47:02 +1100, "Roger" <roger(a)speedy.net.au>
wrote:

No. Rather you would store the path relative to some root folder, in a
varchar(255). Relative because that would make it much easier to move
your document folder or folder tree should the need ever arise.

SQL2008 also has interesting new "FILESTREAM Storage" - check it out
in Books Online.

-Tom.
Microsoft Access MVP


>Thanks Pieter for your reply,
>
>Does SQL have Attachment data type? I tried to do a test migration into SQL
>the end result was that the attachment never came through into the SQL
>database!
>
>Regards
>Roger
>
>"PieterLinden via AccessMonster.com" <u49887(a)uwe> wrote in message
>news:a5c4c3098facf(a)uwe...
>> Roger wrote:
>>>Hi,
>>>I have an Access database with attachment data type enabled, as users are
>>>uploading pdf's and other documents, I am afraid they will fill the
>>>database
>>>(2GB) very quikly.
>>>What are my options to resolve this?
>>>Is there a way to continue using Access? do I need to Migrate to SQL?
>>>(does
>>>SQL fix the problem? does it handle attachment data type?)
>>>
>>>I wish there was a way to archive those attachements!
>>>
>>>Regards
>>>Roger
>>
>> Upsizing is one option. Then use Access as a front end. Requires some
>> rewriting, though, because SQL Server has features that Access doesn't...
>> Otherwise, you would have to store the files in a directory that everyone
>> has
>> access to and then use hyperlinks.
>>
>> --
>> Message posted via AccessMonster.com
>> http://www.accessmonster.com/Uwe/Forums.aspx/access/201003/1
>>