First  |  Prev |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34
M I`5'Perse cution Compari ng the M I5 Persecuti on wit h German Fin al So lution
MI5. Persecution Update: Friday 16 April, 1999 If You. Intend To Reply, Please Read This Please.... keep your response to one page!.. Faxes over a page or two will be deleted. without being read. BBC newscaster Nicholas. Witchell cant stop himself laughing During 1990-91 there were. very many instances of ... 26 Dec 2007 03:38
COMPARE HLL/ASM
santosh suggested (in reply to Wannabee): .... Tell you what, if you are up to it, lets do a routine to convert an hexadecimal string (without '0x' prefix or 'h' suffix) into the corresponding 64 bit numerical value. You do yours in assembler and I'll do mine in C and lets compare the relative speed fo... 26 Dec 2007 09:34
About the BIOS
"almas" <almas.almas(a)orange.fr> wrote in message news:477024a2$0$859$ba4acef3(a)news.orange.fr... Hi every body. I found informations about the BIOS a these address : http://www.qsl.net/f6flv/ I ran across that site a while back also. His articles looked very informative. But, "Je ne parle pas Fran�a... 25 Dec 2007 15:01
About the BIOS
Hi every body. I found informations about the BIOS a these address : http://www.qsl.net/f6flv/ Regards ... 24 Dec 2007 16:34
Father of DOS
"Mike Gonta" <mikegonta(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:62fee9ae-f3f0-4e3d-b52d-6a4c3f7e42d6(a)e23g2000prf.googlegroups.com... and DOS enthusiasts, from the "Father of DOS", Tim Paterson. Do they call him "Daddy Dos"? Ratch ... 24 Dec 2007 02:14
Is PSHUFW instruction MMX or SSE or SSE2? Is NASM manualcorrect?
On Sun, 23 Dec 2007 18:20:27 -0800 (PST) Evenbit <nbaker2328(a)charter.net> wrote: Argh! We should have yar hide { or have the doctors remove *your* 'appendix' } for suggesting that the "cp" command be written in something other than ASM. ;-) Robert has interpreted your use of "cp" to mean the Linux cop... 5 Jan 2008 19:32
Merry Christmas to All.
Betov, may your cellar runneth over. Wannabee, May your microscope get weaker and still do the job, Frank and Keith, May NASM take over the world. Wolfgang, May you never need to chew Wannabee's hat. Randy, May HLA take the universities by storm. Herbert, My Intel make a 68k processor. ... 31 Dec 2007 08:12
Is PSHUFW instruction MMX or SSE or SSE2? Is NASM manual correct?
On Dec 23, 7:19 pm, Charles Crayne <ccra...(a)crayne.org> wrote: On Sun, 23 Dec 2007 15:03:20 -0800 "H. Peter Anvin" <h...(a)zytor.com> wrote: Well, a lot of Appendix B was cut and paste from the source. Yes, and I have started playing with a perl script which will automate the process. Argh! W... 8 Jan 2008 11:04
Is PSHUFW instruction MMX or SSE or SSE2? Is NASM manualcorrect?
On Sat, 22 Dec 2007 19:45:14 -0500 "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have(a)nohavenot.cmm> wrote: According to some NG posts, the reason is that PSHUFW isn't an MMX instruction but an SSE or SSE2 instruction. The Intel manual shows it as an SSE instruction. What about the current NASM manual? The current NAS... 23 Dec 2007 19:38
Is PSHUFW instruction MMX or SSE or SSE2? Is NASM manual correct?
I updated to Adobe's Flash to r119 from r47. FLASH9E.OCX is "blowing chunks" (invalid instruction) on what appears to be a PSHUFW instruction for an AMD K6-2. I've found a few illegal instruction complaints regarding PSHUFW for AMD K6-2's, K6-3's, Celeron's, etc. According to some NG posts, the reason is that ... 23 Dec 2007 17:58
First  |  Prev |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34