From: Paul H on 16 Jun 2010 04:28 On 15 June, 17:23, Banana <Ban...(a)Republic.com> wrote: > On 6/15/10 9:05 AM, Albert D. Kallal wrote: > > > Ah, found it here: > > >http://www.pcpro.co.uk/reviews/software/358558/microsoft-access-2010 > > I can see why it can be misleading. A quick reading seems to imply it's > a change for Access 2010, rather than the web database. > > "Database objects, meanwhile (forms, queries and the like), exist in two > flavours: as client objects or as web objects, with many client features > not supported by the other web equivalent. With no SQL view of queries, > either, converting an existing Access database is likely to take a lot > of work." > > 1) Converting is not even an option if we're talking about taking > objects from existing databases and putting it into a web database. Web > objects must be built from scratch. Now, we certainly can put in old > objects in web database but they're still client objects and thus not > available in a web browser, only when one opens the Access as we always did. > > 2) It really should say "With no SQL view for web queries...", the > problem with conversion notwithstanding. > > It also mentions that FileMaker has had table-level triggers. I don't > remember that. Did anyone hear of that? I wonder if the author is > confusing it with script triggers which as far as I can tell is just > basically counterpart to Access' object events.... > > I think it goes back to the old adage: "Don't believe everything you read." Phew! Panic averted. Bleedin' journalists. ;O) Paul
|
Pages: 1 Prev: Access subform issues Next: Prevent Rounding of Double in Report |