Acessing computers over the network
in [Network and Web]
|
From: harryguy082589 on 21 Feb 2005 13:26 Here is my tablet: CDiagnosis V1.07 Start diagnosis for DAN_TABLET (Targets dan_basement 192.168.1.6 dan_tablet 192.168.1.4 ) "ping www.yahoo.com" Pinging www.yahoo.akadns.net [216.109.118.72] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 216.109.118.72: bytes=32 time=18ms TTL=52 Reply from 216.109.118.72: bytes=32 time=18ms TTL=52 Reply from 216.109.118.72: bytes=32 time=19ms TTL=52 Reply from 216.109.118.72: bytes=32 time=35ms TTL=52 Ping statistics for 216.109.118.72: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 18ms, Maximum = 35ms, Average = 22ms "ping 66.94.230.32" Pinging 66.94.230.32 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 66.94.230.32: bytes=32 time=79ms TTL=50 Reply from 66.94.230.32: bytes=32 time=83ms TTL=50 Reply from 66.94.230.32: bytes=32 time=80ms TTL=50 Reply from 66.94.230.32: bytes=32 time=98ms TTL=50 Ping statistics for 66.94.230.32: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 79ms, Maximum = 98ms, Average = 85ms Target dan_basement "ping dan_basement" Pinging dan_basement [192.168.1.6] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 192.168.1.6: bytes=32 time=2ms TTL=128 Reply from 192.168.1.6: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128 Reply from 192.168.1.6: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=128 Reply from 192.168.1.6: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=128 Ping statistics for 192.168.1.6: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 2ms, Average = 1ms "net view dan_basement" Shared resources at dan_basement Share name Type Used as Comment ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Music Disk Temp Disk The command completed successfully. Target 192.168.1.6 "ping 192.168.1.6" Pinging 192.168.1.6 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 192.168.1.6: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128 Reply from 192.168.1.6: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128 Reply from 192.168.1.6: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=128 Reply from 192.168.1.6: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=128 Ping statistics for 192.168.1.6: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 1ms, Average = 0ms "net view 192.168.1.6" Shared resources at 192.168.1.6 Share name Type Used as Comment ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Music Disk Temp Disk The command completed successfully. Target dan_tablet "ping dan_tablet" Pinging dan_tablet [192.168.1.4] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 192.168.1.4: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128 Reply from 192.168.1.4: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128 Reply from 192.168.1.4: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128 Reply from 192.168.1.4: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128 Ping statistics for 192.168.1.4: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 0ms, Average = 0ms "net view dan_tablet" Shared resources at dan_tablet Share name Type Used as Comment ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- COL9073 Disk Share Disk sharetry Disk temp Disk tempshare Disk The command completed successfully. Target 192.168.1.4 "ping 192.168.1.4" Pinging 192.168.1.4 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 192.168.1.4: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128 Reply from 192.168.1.4: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128 Reply from 192.168.1.4: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128 Reply from 192.168.1.4: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128 Ping statistics for 192.168.1.4: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 0ms, Average = 0ms "net view 192.168.1.4" Shared resources at 192.168.1.4 Share name Type Used as Comment ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- COL9073 Disk Share Disk sharetry Disk temp Disk tempshare Disk The command completed successfully. Target 127.0.0.1 "ping 127.0.0.1" Pinging 127.0.0.1 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 127.0.0.1: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128 Reply from 127.0.0.1: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128 Reply from 127.0.0.1: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128 Reply from 127.0.0.1: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128 Ping statistics for 127.0.0.1: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 0ms, Average = 0ms "net view 127.0.0.1" Shared resources at 127.0.0.1 Share name Type Used as Comment ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- COL9073 Disk Share Disk sharetry Disk temp Disk tempshare Disk The command completed successfully. Target 192.168.1.1 "ping 192.168.1.1" Pinging 192.168.1.1 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=2ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=64 Ping statistics for 192.168.1.1: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 1ms, Maximum = 2ms, Average = 1ms "net view 192.168.1.1" End diagnosis for DAN_TABLET Chuck wrote: > On 18 Feb 2005 14:22:12 -0800, "harryguy082589" <harryguy082589(a)comcast.net> > wrote: > > >Here is the browstat for my tablet: > > > >Status for domain status on transport > >\Device\NetBT_Tcpip_{4D2C6DD7-2CAE-4269-81F5-EFFF394E240C} > > Browsing is NOT active on domain. > > Master name cannot be determined from GetAdapterStatus. > > > >And for the heck of it here is the one on my desk: > > > >Status for domain IRWIN on transport > >\Device\NetBT_Tcpip_{BF1CE17D-469D-4161-9B59-38E9D6DA856E} > > Browsing is active on domain. > > Master browser name is: DAN_BASEMENT > > Master browser is running build 2600 > > 1 backup servers retrieved from master DAN_BASEMENT > > \\DAN_BASEMENT > > There are 2 servers in domain IRWIN on transport > >\Device\NetBT_Tcpip_{BF1CE17D-469D-4161-9B59-38E9D6DA856E} > > There are 2 domains in domain IRWIN on transport > >\Device\NetBT_Tcpip_{BF1CE17D-469D-4161-9B59-38E9D6DA856E} > > > > > >I don't remember if the mapping of the drive before was before or > >after changing the permissions, but it still works now that they have > >been changed. How would this matter though? I believe i changed the > >permission on the tablet, and the tablet is mapping the drive on > >desktop not itself on itself (which it can't do even if I wanted to). > >The desktop can't access the tablet now and couldn't before i changed > >it either > > > >thanks again, > > > >Dan > > Dan, > > With Windows XP Pro, your server (computer sharing itself) provides network > access based upon the Guest account, or upon a common non-Guest account. If the > computer is running Simple File Sharing, or if it's running Advanced File > Sharing with "Guest only" Network access Local Security Policy, it will always > use Guest authentication. > > If your computer is running Advanced File Sharing with "Classic" Network access > Local Security Policy, and if you have a common non-Guest account with identical > non-blank password, your computer will use non-Guest authentication. > > If you're using a non-Guest account, that has administrative privilege on the > server, you'll be able to get complete browstat results from any computer that > regards the server as its master browser. If you're using a non-Guest account > without administrative privilege, or if your're using the Guest account, you > won't - you'll see "Could not open key in registry, error = 5". > > On 2/15, you posted a pair of browstat logs, one for dan_basement, the other for > dan_tablet. The browstat for dan_basement was predictably complete, and showed > dan_basement to be the master browser. The browstat for dan_tablet showed > dan_basement to be the master browser, but showed the above mentioned error. > > I asked you if you had done the network drive map / file access tests before or > after you tweaked the Guest account in the deny list, in an effort to figure out > what has not been done yet. Based upon the browstat logs from 2/15, I am > suspecting that you have not yet established administrative access from > dan_tablet to dan_basement. The question now is whether that is because you are > still using Guest authentication on dan_basement, or whether the non-Guest > account used does not have administrative privilege. > > So that is one question. The second, more obvious, is why browstat from > dan_tablet occasionally (as in 2/18) shows "Browsing is NOT active on domain", > yet at other times (as in 2/15) it recognises dan_basement as the master > browser. And when each of these two symptoms are observed variously, do you > actually have file sharing / connectivity between the two computers? > > Let's try and define exactly what your symptoms are. > > Take the following code (everything inside the "#####"). Please verify computer > names and ip addresses FIRST against "ipconfig /all" from both computers, and > correct if necessary. If you've rebooted either computer, and it has gotten a > different dynamic ip address, this is essential. > > Open Notepad. Ensure that Format - Word Wrap is not checked. Highlight then > Copy the code (Ctrl-C), precisely as it is keyed, and Paste (Ctrl-V) into > Notepad. Correct ip addresses if and only if necessary. > Save the Notepad file as "cdiag.cmd", as type "All Files", into the root folder > "C:\". > Run it by Start - Run - "c:\cdiag". > Wait patiently. > When Notepad opens up displaying c:\cdiag.txt, first check Format and ensure > that Word Wrap is NOT checked! Then, copy the entire contents (Ctrl-A Ctrl-C) > and paste (Ctrl-V) into your next post. > > Do this from both computers, please, with all computers powered up and online. > > ##### > > @echo off > set FullTarget1=dan_basement 192.168.1.6 > set FullTarget2=dan_tablet 192.168.1.7 192.168.1.4 > set FullTarget3= > set FullTarget4= > set FullTargets=%FullTarget1% %FullTarget2% %FullTarget3% %FullTarget4% > set PingTargets=127.0.0.1 192.168.1.1 > Set Version=V1.07 > @echo CDiagnosis %Version% >c:\cdiag.txt > @echo Start diagnosis for %computername% (Targets %FullTargets%) >>c:\cdiag.txt > @echo. >>c:\cdiag.txt > @echo "ping www.yahoo.com" >>c:\cdiag.txt > @echo. >>c:\cdiag.txt > ping www.yahoo.com >>c:\cdiag.txt > @echo. >>c:\cdiag.txt > @echo "ping 66.94.230.32" >>c:\cdiag.txt > @echo. >>c:\cdiag.txt > ping 66.94.230.32 >>c:\cdiag.txt > for %%a in (%FullTargets% %PingTargets%) do ( > @echo. >>c:\cdiag.txt > @echo Target %%a >>c:\cdiag.txt > @echo. >>c:\cdiag.txt > @echo "ping %%a" >>c:\cdiag.txt > @echo. >>c:\cdiag.txt > ping %%a >>c:\cdiag.txt > @echo. >>c:\cdiag.txt > @echo "net view %%a" >>c:\cdiag.txt > @echo. >>c:\cdiag.txt > net view %%a >>c:\cdiag.txt > ) > @echo End diagnosis for %computername% >>c:\cdiag.txt > notepad c:\cdiag.txt > :EOF > > ##### > > -- > Cheers, > Chuck > Paranoia comes from experience - and is not necessarily a bad thing. > My email is AT DOT > actual address pchuck sonic net
From: harryguy082589 on 21 Feb 2005 13:35 Now for my desktop: CDiagnosis V1.07 Start diagnosis for DAN_BASEMENT (Targets dan_basement 192.168.1.6 dan_tablet 192.168.1.4 ) "ping www.yahoo.com" Pinging www.yahoo.akadns.net [68.142.226.45] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 68.142.226.45: bytes=32 time=22ms TTL=51 Reply from 68.142.226.45: bytes=32 time=19ms TTL=51 Reply from 68.142.226.45: bytes=32 time=25ms TTL=51 Reply from 68.142.226.45: bytes=32 time=20ms TTL=51 Ping statistics for 68.142.226.45: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 19ms, Maximum = 25ms, Average = 21ms "ping 66.94.230.32" Pinging 66.94.230.32 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 66.94.230.32: bytes=32 time=80ms TTL=50 Reply from 66.94.230.32: bytes=32 time=80ms TTL=50 Reply from 66.94.230.32: bytes=32 time=79ms TTL=50 Reply from 66.94.230.32: bytes=32 time=79ms TTL=50 Ping statistics for 66.94.230.32: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 79ms, Maximum = 80ms, Average = 79ms Target dan_basement "ping dan_basement" Pinging dan_basement [192.168.1.6] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 192.168.1.6: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128 Reply from 192.168.1.6: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128 Reply from 192.168.1.6: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128 Reply from 192.168.1.6: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128 Ping statistics for 192.168.1.6: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 0ms, Average = 0ms "net view dan_basement" Shared resources at dan_basement Share name Type Used as Comment ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Music Disk Temp Disk The command completed successfully. Target 192.168.1.6 "ping 192.168.1.6" Pinging 192.168.1.6 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 192.168.1.6: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128 Reply from 192.168.1.6: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128 Reply from 192.168.1.6: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128 Reply from 192.168.1.6: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128 Ping statistics for 192.168.1.6: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 0ms, Average = 0ms "net view 192.168.1.6" Shared resources at 192.168.1.6 Share name Type Used as Comment ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Music Disk Temp Disk The command completed successfully. Target dan_tablet "ping dan_tablet" Ping request could not find host dan_tablet. Please check the name and try again. "net view dan_tablet" Target 192.168.1.4 "ping 192.168.1.4" Pinging 192.168.1.4 with 32 bytes of data: Request timed out. Request timed out. Request timed out. Request timed out. Ping statistics for 192.168.1.4: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 0, Lost = 4 (100% loss), "net view 192.168.1.4" Target 127.0.0.1 "ping 127.0.0.1" Pinging 127.0.0.1 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 127.0.0.1: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128 Reply from 127.0.0.1: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128 Reply from 127.0.0.1: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128 Reply from 127.0.0.1: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128 Ping statistics for 127.0.0.1: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 0ms, Average = 0ms "net view 127.0.0.1" Shared resources at 127.0.0.1 Share name Type Used as Comment ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Music Disk Temp Disk The command completed successfully. Target 192.168.1.1 "ping 192.168.1.1" Pinging 192.168.1.1 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=64 Ping statistics for 192.168.1.1: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 1ms, Maximum = 1ms, Average = 1ms "net view 192.168.1.1" End diagnosis for DAN_BASEMENT ------------------------------------------------ I got three instances of the error: >"System error 53 has occurred. > The netwrok path was not found." also On my tablet i made sure that it was olny concted through the wireless not the both the wired and wireless so that it had two IP adresses Also i give both my tablet and desktop fixed IP adress (my desktop 192.168.1.6 and my tablet 192.168.1.4) Thanx again Chuck wrote: > On 18 Feb 2005 14:22:12 -0800, "harryguy082589" <harryguy082589(a)comcast.net> > wrote: > > >Here is the browstat for my tablet: > > > >Status for domain status on transport > >\Device\NetBT_Tcpip_{4D2C6DD7-2CAE-4269-81F5-EFFF394E240C} > > Browsing is NOT active on domain. > > Master name cannot be determined from GetAdapterStatus. > > > >And for the heck of it here is the one on my desk: > > > >Status for domain IRWIN on transport > >\Device\NetBT_Tcpip_{BF1CE17D-469D-4161-9B59-38E9D6DA856E} > > Browsing is active on domain. > > Master browser name is: DAN_BASEMENT > > Master browser is running build 2600 > > 1 backup servers retrieved from master DAN_BASEMENT > > \\DAN_BASEMENT > > There are 2 servers in domain IRWIN on transport > >\Device\NetBT_Tcpip_{BF1CE17D-469D-4161-9B59-38E9D6DA856E} > > There are 2 domains in domain IRWIN on transport > >\Device\NetBT_Tcpip_{BF1CE17D-469D-4161-9B59-38E9D6DA856E} > > > > > >I don't remember if the mapping of the drive before was before or > >after changing the permissions, but it still works now that they have > >been changed. How would this matter though? I believe i changed the > >permission on the tablet, and the tablet is mapping the drive on > >desktop not itself on itself (which it can't do even if I wanted to). > >The desktop can't access the tablet now and couldn't before i changed > >it either > > > >thanks again, > > > >Dan > > Dan, > > With Windows XP Pro, your server (computer sharing itself) provides network > access based upon the Guest account, or upon a common non-Guest account. If the > computer is running Simple File Sharing, or if it's running Advanced File > Sharing with "Guest only" Network access Local Security Policy, it will always > use Guest authentication. > > If your computer is running Advanced File Sharing with "Classic" Network access > Local Security Policy, and if you have a common non-Guest account with identical > non-blank password, your computer will use non-Guest authentication. > > If you're using a non-Guest account, that has administrative privilege on the > server, you'll be able to get complete browstat results from any computer that > regards the server as its master browser. If you're using a non-Guest account > without administrative privilege, or if your're using the Guest account, you > won't - you'll see "Could not open key in registry, error = 5". > > On 2/15, you posted a pair of browstat logs, one for dan_basement, the other for > dan_tablet. The browstat for dan_basement was predictably complete, and showed > dan_basement to be the master browser. The browstat for dan_tablet showed > dan_basement to be the master browser, but showed the above mentioned error. > > I asked you if you had done the network drive map / file access tests before or > after you tweaked the Guest account in the deny list, in an effort to figure out > what has not been done yet. Based upon the browstat logs from 2/15, I am > suspecting that you have not yet established administrative access from > dan_tablet to dan_basement. The question now is whether that is because you are > still using Guest authentication on dan_basement, or whether the non-Guest > account used does not have administrative privilege. > > So that is one question. The second, more obvious, is why browstat from > dan_tablet occasionally (as in 2/18) shows "Browsing is NOT active on domain", > yet at other times (as in 2/15) it recognises dan_basement as the master > browser. And when each of these two symptoms are observed variously, do you > actually have file sharing / connectivity between the two computers? > > Let's try and define exactly what your symptoms are. > > Take the following code (everything inside the "#####"). Please verify computer > names and ip addresses FIRST against "ipconfig /all" from both computers, and > correct if necessary. If you've rebooted either computer, and it has gotten a > different dynamic ip address, this is essential. > > Open Notepad. Ensure that Format - Word Wrap is not checked. Highlight then > Copy the code (Ctrl-C), precisely as it is keyed, and Paste (Ctrl-V) into > Notepad. Correct ip addresses if and only if necessary. > Save the Notepad file as "cdiag.cmd", as type "All Files", into the root folder > "C:\". > Run it by Start - Run - "c:\cdiag". > Wait patiently. > When Notepad opens up displaying c:\cdiag.txt, first check Format and ensure > that Word Wrap is NOT checked! Then, copy the entire contents (Ctrl-A Ctrl-C) > and paste (Ctrl-V) into your next post. > > Do this from both computers, please, with all computers powered up and online. > > ##### > > @echo off > set FullTarget1=dan_basement 192.168.1.6 > set FullTarget2=dan_tablet 192.168.1.7 192.168.1.4 > set FullTarget3= > set FullTarget4= > set FullTargets=%FullTarget1% %FullTarget2% %FullTarget3% %FullTarget4% > set PingTargets=127.0.0.1 192.168.1.1 > Set Version=V1.07 > @echo CDiagnosis %Version% >c:\cdiag.txt > @echo Start diagnosis for %computername% (Targets %FullTargets%) >>c:\cdiag.txt > @echo. >>c:\cdiag.txt > @echo "ping www.yahoo.com" >>c:\cdiag.txt > @echo. >>c:\cdiag.txt > ping www.yahoo.com >>c:\cdiag.txt > @echo. >>c:\cdiag.txt > @echo "ping 66.94.230.32" >>c:\cdiag.txt > @echo. >>c:\cdiag.txt > ping 66.94.230.32 >>c:\cdiag.txt > for %%a in (%FullTargets% %PingTargets%) do ( > @echo. >>c:\cdiag.txt > @echo Target %%a >>c:\cdiag.txt > @echo. >>c:\cdiag.txt > @echo "ping %%a" >>c:\cdiag.txt > @echo. >>c:\cdiag.txt > ping %%a >>c:\cdiag.txt > @echo. >>c:\cdiag.txt > @echo "net view %%a" >>c:\cdiag.txt > @echo. >>c:\cdiag.txt > net view %%a >>c:\cdiag.txt > ) > @echo End diagnosis for %computername% >>c:\cdiag.txt > notepad c:\cdiag.txt > :EOF > > ##### > > -- > Cheers, > Chuck > Paranoia comes from experience - and is not necessarily a bad thing. > My email is AT DOT > actual address pchuck sonic net
From: Gordon on 21 Feb 2005 13:37 harryguy082589(a)gmail.com wrote: > Hi, > > I just reformatted and reinstalled windows on my desktop and tablet pc, > my desktop with xp pro and my tablet with xp tablet pc edition, a > superset of xp pro. I have finally gotten around to setting up network > sharing and have seem to run into a problem: I shared a drive on my > desktop and a drive on my tablet, when I click on "view workgroup > computers" to access my desktop I see the desktop and can access the > share, but when I click on "view workgroup computers" on my desktop > I can see the tablet, but when I click on it I'm told: > > "\\dan_tablet is not accessible. You might not have permission to > use this network resource. Contact the administrator of this server to > find out if you have access permissions. > > The network path was not found." > > Any ideas why? > > Thanks for the help, > > Dan > > p.s > > I'm not using simple sharing on either computer, they both have the > shares set up with everyone given full control, have tc\ip installed > with "NetBios over Tcp/ip" enabled , have all firewalls turned off, > and I'm using the administrator account of try and access one > another. > Do the administrator accounts both have the same login and password? -- Interim Systems and Management Accounting Gordon Burgess-Parker Director www.gbpcomputing.co.uk
From: harryguy082589 on 21 Feb 2005 14:52 Yes Gordon wrote: > harryguy082589(a)gmail.com wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I just reformatted and reinstalled windows on my desktop and tablet pc, > > my desktop with xp pro and my tablet with xp tablet pc edition, a > > superset of xp pro. I have finally gotten around to setting up network > > sharing and have seem to run into a problem: I shared a drive on my > > desktop and a drive on my tablet, when I click on "view workgroup > > computers" to access my desktop I see the desktop and can access the > > share, but when I click on "view workgroup computers" on my desktop > > I can see the tablet, but when I click on it I'm told: > > > > "\\dan_tablet is not accessible. You might not have permission to > > use this network resource. Contact the administrator of this server to > > find out if you have access permissions. > > > > The network path was not found." > > > > Any ideas why? > > > > Thanks for the help, > > > > Dan > > > > p.s > > > > I'm not using simple sharing on either computer, they both have the > > shares set up with everyone given full control, have tc\ip installed > > with "NetBios over Tcp/ip" enabled , have all firewalls turned off, > > and I'm using the administrator account of try and access one > > another. > > > > Do the administrator accounts both have the same login and password? > > -- > Interim Systems and Management Accounting > Gordon Burgess-Parker > Director > www.gbpcomputing.co.uk
From: harryguy082589 on 22 Feb 2005 22:48 Hea, I was able to fix my problem, I decided to compare the security policies on my desktop to my tablet and make the ones on my tablet= to my desktop ones, and it did it. Thanks for all the help with everything, Dan p.s I don't know if this means anything, but prior to changing the polices on my tablet to be like my desktop there were three on my desktop which said "not applicable", but on my tablet I could enable/disable. P.S.S It also could have been that I found I had disabled the firewall service, but after my computers connected I disabled it again and everything still works. harryguy082589 wrote: > Yes > > Gordon wrote: > > harryguy082589(a)gmail.com wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I just reformatted and reinstalled windows on my desktop and tablet > pc, > > > my desktop with xp pro and my tablet with xp tablet pc edition, a > > > superset of xp pro. I have finally gotten around to setting up > network > > > sharing and have seem to run into a problem: I shared a drive on my > > > desktop and a drive on my tablet, when I click on "view workgroup > > > computers" to access my desktop I see the desktop and can access > the > > > share, but when I click on "view workgroup computers" on my desktop > > > I can see the tablet, but when I click on it I'm told: > > > > > > "\\dan_tablet is not accessible. You might not have permission to > > > use this network resource. Contact the administrator of this server > to > > > find out if you have access permissions. > > > > > > The network path was not found." > > > > > > Any ideas why? > > > > > > Thanks for the help, > > > > > > Dan > > > > > > p.s > > > > > > I'm not using simple sharing on either computer, they both have the > > > shares set up with everyone given full control, have tc\ip > installed > > > with "NetBios over Tcp/ip" enabled , have all firewalls turned off, > > > and I'm using the administrator account of try and access one > > > another. > > > > > > > Do the administrator accounts both have the same login and password? > > > > -- > > Interim Systems and Management Accounting > > Gordon Burgess-Parker > > Director > > www.gbpcomputing.co.uk
First
|
Prev
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 Prev: Limited or no connectivity error after installing sp2 Next: XP & 98 not talking (also) |