From: Reini Urban on
vanekl schrieb:
> Lars Rune N�stdal wrote:
>> http://www.colinux.org/
>>
>> ..i haven't tried this.. (no need)
>
> I run SBCL on my WinXP_SP2 box everyday.
> coLinux is more stable than its host, and its fast.
> I'm running the debian kernel for coLinux.

It's more stable and it's MUCH faster.
I compile and valgrind debug all my perls within coLinux to test it.
I'm running redhat and debian.

My colinux apache is also much faster than the native windows apache
(same versions).
From: vanekl on
Reini Urban wrote:
> vanekl schrieb:
>> Lars Rune N�stdal wrote:
>>> http://www.colinux.org/
>>>
>>> ..i haven't tried this.. (no need)
>>
>> I run SBCL on my WinXP_SP2 box everyday.
>> coLinux is more stable than its host, and its fast.
>> I'm running the debian kernel for coLinux.
>
> It's more stable and it's MUCH faster.
> I compile and valgrind debug all my perls within coLinux to test it.
> I'm running redhat and debian.
>
> My colinux apache is also much faster than the native windows apache
> (same versions).

Yup. Ironically, the biggest stability issue I'm having is with the
unholy trinity of FF3/VLC/Adobe pdf reader that occasionally
get into food fights and bring the entire system down, including coLinux.
It's not coLinux's fault, but this does indirectly influence its uptime.