From: Annika1980 on
On May 5, 8:21 pm, Alan Browne <alan.bro...(a)freelunchvideotron.ca>
wrote:
> Annika1980 wrote:
> >http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/96576825
>
> >http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/96576826
>
> >http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/96576827
>
> All very nice.
>
> Could you e-mail me the raw for the first one? I want to play with it in PS.
>
> Cheers,
> Alan

IMAGE THIEF!
IMAGE THIEF!

WAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHH !!!!!!!!!
From: Annika1980 on
On May 5, 8:39 pm, m II <c...(a)in.the.hat> wrote:
>
> Look dimwit, the following is NOT an attack. I was being civilized.
>
> I said:
> "As an aside, wouldn't some sort of attribution be in order?"
>

You said this in your orignal post when you posted the pic:

"As will be quickly noticed, much like Annika's shots, no attempt at
composition or artistic merit was attempted."

I consider that an attack. Once you lob the first volley, it's on.
So you shouldn't be bitching about whatever happens next.
As for me apologizing ..... yeah, hold your breath.
So I guess you'll have to stalk me from now on. You can get in line
behind the others.







From: Annika1980 on
On May 5, 8:55 pm, "Atheist Chaplain" <abu...(a)cia.gov> wrote:

> I too would be pissed with you Brett, you may be a good photographer but
> your certainly no angel.

Never claimed to be. I do have one, however.

From: m II on
Annika1980 wrote:

> But if you start with me, you get what you get.


Coming from a lying thief, that's quite a threat.



mike
From: m II on
Annika1980 wrote:

> As for me apologizing ..... yeah, hold your breath.
> So I guess you'll have to stalk me from now on. You can get in line
> behind the others.


Quite condescending for a lying thief.




mike