|
From: Steve Terry on 5 May 2008 11:03 "Rowland McDonnell" <real-address-in-sig(a)flur.bltigibbet> wrote in message news:1iggo3n.1x6r74o1870948N%real-address-in-sig(a)flur.bltigibbet... > Retired <retired(a)bprivacy.com> wrote: > >> "Rowland McDonnell" <real-address-in-sig(a)flur.bltigibbet> wrote: >> > Retired <retired(a)bprivacy.com> wrote: >> > >> > [snip] >> >> > Anyway, Sinn Fein is/was the /political/ wing of the IRA and it was the >> > IRA that handled the killing. >> > >> So if the BNP form a British Liberation Army, it'll be OK for them to >> murder >> and maim, leaving the BNP to become the respectable face? > > So you decided to ignore the bit where I explained that I abhor the > tactics of the IRA? And you decided to ignore the bit where I > explained that, unlike BNP scum, the Irish had a legitimate grievance > back in the 1960s and 1970s? > > (British rule was then causing harm to the RC part of the population of > NI - although the matter is centuries old and hence more than a little > complicated so not particularly `the fault of the British government of > the day'). > Quite right the British troops should have stayed out of it, and let the UDF, etc. keep on killing Catholics. For once i agree with you Steve Terry
From: Mrcheerful on 5 May 2008 11:58 dennis(a)home wrote: > "Mrcheerful" <nbkm57(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message > news:6KCTj.20024$yD2.15349(a)text.news.virginmedia.com... >> Rowland McDonnell wrote: >>> PeterT <peterthomas8899(a)googlemail.com> wrote: >>> >>> [snip] >>> >>>> But how will the other members be able to criticise him if they >>>> don't listen to whatever it is he has to say? >>> >>> Easy: he's the BNP rep. They criticise him because he's the >>> represenative of a party of racist scumbags, and the only way to >>> deal with that sort is shut them out, shut them up, and then >>> flatten them. >> >> Which dictator said those words? What about free speech? The >> powers that be always try to silence any opposition by fair means or >> foul ! > > Been through this in the seventies while at uni.. > had a meeting where the NF wanted to talk.. > told them no, so they invoked free speech and called for a vote.. > we voted for free speech and to let them talk and then left the > meeting.. everyone but the NF members left so they could have their > free speech. Its a right to free speech not a right to make people > listen to cr(a)p. so why invoke violence? peace is the way.
First
|
Prev
|
Pages: 1 2 Prev: BNP OUT! was Re: OT: BNP man to be shunned in London assembly Next: virtualbox 1.6: ho tried? |