|
From: Ben Voigt [C++ MVP] on 8 May 2008 12:42 Pavel A. wrote: > "Armageddon" <Armageddon(a)discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > news:D80B0827-3D9C-41E5-A470-036D4D6BA4EE(a)microsoft.com... > >> Doesn't the link from the hub to the device simply look like a >> plain full speed link? > > No, the physical signaling is different in high speed mode (besides > of the obvious timing differences) The link from the full-speed device to the hub is the same as from full-speed device to root port. The hub has to manage translating everything to high-speed. > > --PA
From: Ben Voigt [C++ MVP] on 8 May 2008 12:47 > Is the problem here that usbser.sys just isn't very supported by > Microsoft because it isn't high priority. Has anybody else tried > connecting a full speed usbser.sys device to a host via a high speed > hub? Unforntinatly, their arn't very many usbser devices and I don't > own any to try. We've seen various problems with different devices when connected through a high-speed hub. We're have some FTDI serial chips right now that don't use the usbser.sys but will be evaling the Microchip PIC-based USB chips because the FTDI drivers are plenty buggy. You might additionally try putting a full-speed hub upstream of the high-speed hub, and see what happens there. Probably the same as if you forced the root port into full-speed by disabling EHCI.
From: Ben Voigt [C++ MVP] on 8 May 2008 12:48 chris.aseltine(a)gmail.com wrote: > On May 2, 11:56 am, Armageddon <Armaged...(a)discussions.microsoft.com> > wrote: > >> Is the problem here that usbser.sys just isn't very supported by >> Microsoft because it isn't high priority. > > Look, no. Why are you blaming usbser.sys without any evidence? Why > do you think it's "not very supported" or "not a high priority"? > >> Has anybody else tried connecting a full speed usbser.sys device to >> a host via a high speed hub? > > Yes. I've personally done this hundreds, if not thousands of times > with no issues. Which chip is used for the device-side USB interface?
First
|
Prev
|
Pages: 1 2 3 Prev: Asyc Call Of MiniportProcessSGList Next: Windows 95/98 Vxd driver question |