Prev: Slime is broken for ECL
Next: Deserialization question
From: Mark Carter on 13 Jun 2010 06:01
On 13 June, 09:23, Mark Carter <alt.mcar...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Any ideas on a way forward

I downloaded the sources for the latest version of SBCL, and grep'd
for the offending message, and removed it. To my surprise, SBCL
compiled flawlessly from a previous version. I was expecting a lot
more pain.
 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: Slime is broken for ECL
Next: Deserialization question