|
From: dpb on 22 Apr 2008 16:27 Steve Lionel wrote: > On Tue, 22 Apr 2008 11:28:33 -0500, dpb <none(a)non.net> wrote: > >> I had sorta' thought the CVF might be considered even further OT in >> current Intel forum than here, despite the earlier connections... > > No, we welcome CVF users there. You won't get "official" help, but there are > many CVF-knowlegable users there. .... OK, good to know. Turns out I hadn't done the upgrade beyond 6.6 at all, but didn't make a difference in the symptoms. In actuality, it is the references to the MS documentation for the Win API that isn't being found I see--the CVF Fortran doc reference is directed to the disk copy, not the CD. I noticed in the installation notes there's a mention of the df60.chw file being built and of roughly 30 Mb whereas I notice the one one this machine is now only about 18 Mb. If that rings any bells, ok; if not, if I can't figure out what's going on in comparison to the earlier machine on which all was referenced from the local disk, I'll post a query on the Intel board... Thanks, again, Steve, for all you do do...(and yes, I know it's your day job) :) --
From: Steve Lionel on 22 Apr 2008 16:43 On Tue, 22 Apr 2008 15:27:08 -0500, dpb <none(a)non.net> wrote: >Thanks, again, Steve, for all you do do...(and yes, I know it's your day >job) :) CVF is not my day job any more! :-) -- Steve Lionel Developer Products Division Intel Corporation Nashua, NH For email address, replace "invalid" with "com" User communities for Intel Software Development Products http://softwareforums.intel.com/ Intel Fortran Support http://support.intel.com/support/performancetools/fortran My Fortran blog http://www.intel.com/software/drfortran
From: dpb on 22 Apr 2008 19:51 Steve Lionel wrote: > On Tue, 22 Apr 2008 15:27:08 -0500, dpb <none(a)non.net> wrote: > >> Thanks, again, Steve, for all you do do...(and yes, I know it's your day >> job) :) > > CVF is not my day job any more! :-) Touche! I don't _have_ a day job any more... :) --
From: Jugoslav Dujic on 23 Apr 2008 03:35 dpb wrote: | Steve Lionel wrote: || On Tue, 22 Apr 2008 11:28:33 -0500, dpb <none(a)non.net> wrote: || ||| I had sorta' thought the CVF might be considered even further OT in ||| current Intel forum than here, despite the earlier connections... || || No, we welcome CVF users there. You won't get "official" help, but there are || many CVF-knowlegable users there. | ... | | OK, good to know. | | Turns out I hadn't done the upgrade beyond 6.6 at all, but didn't make a | difference in the symptoms. In actuality, it is the references to the | MS documentation for the Win API that isn't being found I see--the CVF | Fortran doc reference is directed to the disk copy, not the CD. | | I noticed in the installation notes there's a mention of the df60.chw | file being built and of roughly 30 Mb whereas I notice the one one this | machine is now only about 18 Mb. If that rings any bells, ok; if not, | if I can't figure out what's going on in comparison to the earlier | machine on which all was referenced from the local disk, I'll post a | query on the Intel board... My Df60.chw is also 18 MB big, so it isn't the issue. What does your tools/options/help system/preferred collection say? Mine has "Compaq Visual Fortran 6.6 (20.09.2005.)" Now, what the said date refers to -- I'm not sure; it is newer than the 6.6C upgrade (2004). It's probably the time when I did the 6.6C upgrade and/or installed it. Try removing/backing up df60.chw and df60.col and reinstalling the upgrade... something is fishy there, but I can't tell offhand. -- Jugoslav ___________ www.xeffort.com Please reply to the newsgroup. You can find my real e-mail on my home page above.
From: dpb on 23 Apr 2008 09:58 Jugoslav Dujic wrote: > dpb wrote: > | Steve Lionel wrote: > || On Tue, 22 Apr 2008 11:28:33 -0500, dpb <none(a)non.net> wrote: > || > ||| I had sorta' thought the CVF might be considered even further OT in > ||| current Intel forum than here, despite the earlier connections... > || > || No, we welcome CVF users there. You won't get "official" help, but there are > || many CVF-knowlegable users there. > | ... > | > | OK, good to know. > | > | Turns out I hadn't done the upgrade beyond 6.6 at all, but didn't make a > | difference in the symptoms. In actuality, it is the references to the > | MS documentation for the Win API that isn't being found I see--the CVF > | Fortran doc reference is directed to the disk copy, not the CD. > | > | I noticed in the installation notes there's a mention of the df60.chw > | file being built and of roughly 30 Mb whereas I notice the one one this > | machine is now only about 18 Mb. If that rings any bells, ok; if not, > | if I can't figure out what's going on in comparison to the earlier > | machine on which all was referenced from the local disk, I'll post a > | query on the Intel board... > > My Df60.chw is also 18 MB big, so it isn't the issue. > > What does your tools/options/help system/preferred collection say? > Mine has "Compaq Visual Fortran 6.6 (20.09.2005.)" > > Now, what the said date refers to -- I'm not sure; it is newer than > the 6.6C upgrade (2004). It's probably the time when I did the 6.6C > upgrade and/or installed it. > > Try removing/backing up df60.chw and df60.col and reinstalling the > upgrade... something is fishy there, but I can't tell offhand. Thanks, for the thoughts -- I discovered (I thought I had looked before, but obviously I was wrong) that only the Fortran chm files were on the hard drive and I couldn't get either of the installs to do anything useful w/o uninstalling and starting over. So, I did a copy w/ the "update only" option of the DOC subdirectory and after pointing to the disk address it seems to have "stuck" in the IDE now and to be functioning correctly. I don't know if something went wrong during the installation or whether I somehow unselected the choice to install the additional files, but it seems fixed... --
|
Pages: 1 Prev: Polyhedron Benchmark Update Next: curious about 8 byte LOGICAL... |