|
From: Tom Serface on 9 May 2008 01:10 The really sad part is that most of the competition is slowly phasing out which really tends to stifle innovation. I actually hope something cool comes out of the merging of these technologies, but my guess is the CodeGear stuff will be used for something proprietary. Tom "Giovanni Dicanio" <giovanni.dicanio(a)invalid.com> wrote in message news:%23VDzDYPsIHA.3940(a)TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... > > "Les" <l.neilson(a)nospam.acecad.co.uk> ha scritto nel messaggio > news:fvuja6$143j$1(a)newsreader.cw.net... >> The "final nail (or last nail) in the coffin" is whatever finally kills >> off something that has been dying slowly for a long time. > > > Very clear! > Thanks Les. > > Giovanni > >
From: David Ching on 9 May 2008 12:39 "Tom Serface" <tom.nospam(a)camaswood.com> wrote in message news:C977BF4F-E8CF-4F90-ADAA-477C8700F4AF(a)microsoft.com... > The really sad part is that most of the competition is slowly phasing out > which really tends to stifle innovation. I actually hope something cool > comes out of the merging of these technologies, but my guess is the > CodeGear stuff will be used for something proprietary. > It was bought by a company selling a SQL IDE, so whatever comes of it is going to have to do with a database... not exactly mainstream. -- David
From: Tom Serface on 9 May 2008 12:45 Yeah, figures, however, it should be good for the DB company since, even though they lost the marketing war, the IDE from some of the Borland software is still quite good imo. Tom "David Ching" <dc(a)remove-this.dcsoft.com> wrote in message news:A4%Uj.3248$nl7.2884(a)flpi146.ffdc.sbc.com... > "Tom Serface" <tom.nospam(a)camaswood.com> wrote in message > news:C977BF4F-E8CF-4F90-ADAA-477C8700F4AF(a)microsoft.com... >> The really sad part is that most of the competition is slowly phasing out >> which really tends to stifle innovation. I actually hope something cool >> comes out of the merging of these technologies, but my guess is the >> CodeGear stuff will be used for something proprietary. >> > > It was bought by a company selling a SQL IDE, so whatever comes of it is > going to have to do with a database... not exactly mainstream. > > -- David > >
From: Ajay Kalra on 9 May 2008 21:11 On May 8, 11:50 pm, "David Ching" <d...(a)remove-this.dcsoft.com> wrote: > "Ajay Kalra" <ajayka...(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message > > news:056D8DE1-0F99-40F9-8E49-52778AA6C298(a)microsoft.com... > > > So, what is/was CodeGear? > > The products of Borland that people here (once) cared about... Delphi, C++ > Builder, etc. Any language product. > > -- David I guess OWL was part of it then? --- Ajay
From: David Ching on 10 May 2008 13:46 "Ajay Kalra" <ajaykalra(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message news:c2c28054-c288-4b6f-8c8f-61cbaf70197e(a)j22g2000hsf.googlegroups.com... > I guess OWL was part of it then? > Not sure... OWL was shipped with Turbo Pascal for Windows and Borland C++, both of which are discontinued. Not sure if OWL shipped with Delphi and C++ Builder. How strange to be talking about these obsolete products. -- David
First
|
Prev
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 Prev: Static class member error Next: MFC-DLL with CString as parameter? |