Confounded by conditional expressions
in [Shell]
|
From: Kenny McCormack on 14 Jul 2010 14:21 In article <2100858.a0AQdONaE2(a)PointedEars.de>, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <usenet(a)PointedEars.de> wrote: .... >BTW, your complaints are misplaced here. This is _not_ the `sh' customer >support. It's not? Then what is it? (I'm really curious what you meant by the crack) -- > No, I haven't, that's why I'm asking questions. If you won't help me, > why don't you just go find your lost manhood elsewhere. CLC in a nutshell.
From: Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn on 14 Jul 2010 17:04 Kenny McCormack wrote: > Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <usenet(a)PointedEars.de> wrote: >> BTW, your complaints are misplaced here. This is _not_ the `sh' customer >> support. > > It's not? Then what is it? A Usenet (originally: Unix *User* Network) discussion group about shell scripting on Unices. Read the charter, or the tagline in the first place. > (I'm really curious what you meant by the crack) I am quite certain that you are just trolling again. FWIW, for the intellectually challenged: There is no `sh' customer support, and the people reading and posting here are most certainly not responsible for possible flaws in the quoted `sh' manpage. So complaints about the software discussed here are most certainly a waste of everybody's time. You owe me five minutes of my life. -- PointedEars
From: Sven Mascheck on 14 Jul 2010 17:16 boblatest wrote: > but what the heck, the manpage is supposed to be a quick reference! reference: yes. quick: yes! howto or tutorial: no.
From: Kenny McCormack on 14 Jul 2010 20:53 In article <7756307.FP6jjVeTY9(a)PointedEars.de>, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <usenet(a)PointedEars.de> wrote: >Kenny McCormack wrote: > >> Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <usenet(a)PointedEars.de> wrote: >>> BTW, your complaints are misplaced here. This is _not_ the `sh' customer >>> support. >> >> It's not? Then what is it? > >A Usenet (originally: Unix *User* Network) discussion group about shell >scripting on Unices. Read the charter, or the tagline in the first place. > >> (I'm really curious what you meant by the crack) > >I am quite certain that you are just trolling again. > >FWIW, for the intellectually challenged: There is no `sh' customer support, >and the people reading and posting here are most certainly not responsible >for possible flaws in the quoted `sh' manpage. So complaints about the >software discussed here are most certainly a waste of everybody's time. > >You owe me five minutes of my life. > >-- >PointedEars You really *are* a piece of work. -- Just for a change of pace, this sig is *not* an obscure reference to comp.lang.c...
From: Robert Latest on 16 Jul 2010 01:59
Sven Mascheck wrote: > boblatest wrote: > >> but what the heck, the manpage is supposed to be a quick reference! > > reference: yes. quick: yes! howto or tutorial: no. Don't get me wrong, I wasn't criticizing the manpage (because, firstly, this isn't the right forum to do so and, secondly, I might as well invest that time in improving the page -- staying in the spirit of free software). robert |