Counterexamples to Relativity
in [Relativity]
|
From: Jim Black on 12 Aug 2010 00:39 Conservapedia has joined the anti-relativity movement. They could use some help from some of the resident anti-relativity "experts" here. Do you have a disproof of relativity? Add it to the list: http://www.conservapedia.com/Counterexamples_to_Relativity -- Jim E. Black
From: Inertial on 12 Aug 2010 00:56 "Jim Black" wrote in message news:cae87924-d235-4bcf-8ab2-a61987b3a314(a)v6g2000prd.googlegroups.com... > >Conservapedia has joined the anti-relativity movement. They could use >some help from some of the resident anti-relativity "experts" here. >Do you have a disproof of relativity? Add it to the list: > >http://www.conservapedia.com/Counterexamples_to_Relativity They ARE godbot morons at that site, you realise. Don't you love that Jesus performing miracles 'at a distance' is cited as a counter example to relativity? And that genesis talking about a firmament is proof that there is really an aether, and so LET is correct. Of course, none of their counter examples are valid The pioneer and flyby anomalies don't refute relativity .. they are simply not explained solely by relativity. The presence of other factors doesn't refute relativity The authors (or whomever they cite) just don't understand 'relativistic' mass, and that zero rest mass does not mean zero momentum for light. That relativity predicts what is measured is NOT a counter example, nor is the site author's inability to understand what is predicted and observed. Claims that relativity doesn't result in other 'insights' (apart from being wrong) and yields no useful devices is not a counter example. Whether it does or not has no bearing on whether it is an accurate model. They then go on to claim that atomic bombs *were* produced using the theory .. which shows that the theory is correct, not incorrect. They don't even know what a counter-example is !!! Also note that the page http://www.conservapedia.com/Counterexamples_to_Bible says there are no counter examples to the bible. What a joke.
From: Androcles on 12 Aug 2010 00:56 "Jim Black" <tramspap(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message news:cae87924-d235-4bcf-8ab2-a61987b3a314(a)v6g2000prd.googlegroups.com... | Conservapedia has joined the anti-relativity movement. They could use | some help from some of the resident anti-relativity "experts" here. | Do you have a disproof of relativity? Add it to the list: | | http://www.conservapedia.com/Counterexamples_to_Relativity | | -- | Jim E. Black Another pro-aether jesus freak. The resident pro-relativity "bigots" here should be happy they have aetherialist bigots to argue with.
From: BURT on 12 Aug 2010 01:46 On Aug 11, 9:56 pm, "Androcles" <Headmas...(a)Hogwarts.physics_z> wrote: > "Jim Black" <trams...(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message > > news:cae87924-d235-4bcf-8ab2-a61987b3a314(a)v6g2000prd.googlegroups.com... > | Conservapedia has joined the anti-relativity movement. They could use > | some help from some of the resident anti-relativity "experts" here. > | Do you have a disproof of relativity? Add it to the list: > | > |http://www.conservapedia.com/Counterexamples_to_Relativity > | > | -- > | Jim E. Black > > Another pro-aether jesus freak. > The resident pro-relativity "bigots" here should be happy they have > aetherialist bigots to argue with. If a relativist runner runs a race and wins can he say the ground did it? Mitch Raemsch
From: Inertial on 12 Aug 2010 02:14 "BURT" wrote in message news:3839d9bb-372a-45f0-a5dc-e31dd33fc75d(a)v6g2000prd.googlegroups.com... >If a relativist runner runs a race and wins can he say the ground did >it? So .. you're against Galilean and Newtonian relativity. Thanks for clearing that up.
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 Prev: Energy weight of singularity Next: New Generation Lossless Data Representations |