|
From: Ian Rawlings on 24 Nov 2007 10:47 On 2007-11-24, Ian Rawlings <news06(a)tarcus.org.uk> wrote: > So if someone wants to use brasero then it seems that it is only > written to work with wodim/genisofs at the moment. A quick clarification, all my testing was done under gentoo, not using original sources from wodim/cdrecord/mkisofs/genisofs/brasero so it's possible that the issue is down to gentoo packaging rather than original sources. I haven't checked this and doubt that I will as I have stuff to be doing! -- Blast off and strike the evil Bydo empire!
From: Joerg Schilling on 24 Nov 2007 10:57 In article <slrnfkghav.8a7.news06(a)desktop.tarcus.org.uk>, Ian Rawlings <news06(a)tarcus.org.uk> wrote: >On 2007-11-24, Joerg Schilling <js(a)cs.tu-berlin.de> wrote: > >> AFAICT genisoimage does not like to be different from mkisofs but genisoimage >> is full of bugs that have been fixed in mkisofs during the past 2 years. > >If that's the case then Brasero must be working around them in a way >that causes mkisofs to fail, as I had major issues with graft points >using brasero with mkisofs but it worked fine with genisofs (I've just >checked and it was using mkisofs when it failed and genisofs when it >succeeded). Genisoimage is based on a very outdated mkisofs, it has massice bugs with graft points. It is not very likely that it might be possible to work around these bugs. As you don't describe your problems it is impossible to help. -- EMail:joerg(a)schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) J�rg Schilling D-13353 Berlin js(a)cs.tu-berlin.de (uni) schilling(a)fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/ URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
From: Ian Rawlings on 24 Nov 2007 12:14 On 2007-11-24, Joerg Schilling <js(a)cs.tu-berlin.de> wrote: > Genisoimage is based on a very outdated mkisofs, it has massice bugs > with graft points. It is not very likely that it might be possible > to work around these bugs. OK Jorg, now you are being silly. I've already said that despite you claiming that "these bugs" that you claim can't be worked around, genisofs works fine and is doing the job. I've written multiple DVDs with it and even an 8.5 gig one. Just in case it's not quite sunk in yet; brasero and wodim and genisofs can write perfectly good DVDs including directory heirarchies. Brasero, cdrecord and mkisofs do not work, the directory heirarchy is wrecked, even though the heirarchy is very very simple; one directory with files in it. Brasero, cdrecord and mkisofs put half the files in the CD root and half in the directory. Whether this is a problem with brasero, cdrecord, mkisofs or gentoo I do not know. Claiming that wodim/genisofs will not work is very silly as I've already said that they are working fine in a situation where cdrecord/mkisofs failed. -- Blast off and strike the evil Bydo empire!
From: Joerg Schilling on 24 Nov 2007 13:06 In article <slrnfkgmvn.8a7.news06(a)desktop.tarcus.org.uk> you write: >On 2007-11-24, Joerg Schilling <js(a)cs.tu-berlin.de> wrote: >Brasero, cdrecord and mkisofs do not work, the directory heirarchy is >wrecked, even though the heirarchy is very very simple; one directory >with files in it. Brasero, cdrecord and mkisofs put half the files in >the CD root and half in the directory. I am sorry, it you are not willing to cooperate, the best idea is to asume that you have no problem. If you have a problem, you should be able to give the mkisofs commandline, a stripped down source directory tree, the expected and the observed result. If you can't, is there a problem? -- EMail:joerg(a)schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) J�rg Schilling D-13353 Berlin js(a)cs.tu-berlin.de (uni) schilling(a)fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/ URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
From: Unruh on 24 Nov 2007 13:29
Ian Rawlings <news06(a)tarcus.org.uk> writes: >On 2007-11-23, Joerg Schilling <js(a)cs.tu-berlin.de> wrote: >> It is most unlikely that wodim does any better than the original cdrecord. >Other than working when cdrecord didn't! I replaced wodim with >cdrecord some time ago because wodim didn't appear to find my external >plextor dvd drive when used from the command line (but worked fine >when used via gnome's in-built cd creation tool), so was quite >surprised to find out that in this case, wodim worked better. It's >more likely that wodim and cdrecord treat pathnames differently in a >subtle way though and brasero is tested with wodim. >> Be careful that Debian hacked many sources including Brasero and replaced the >> thring "cdrecord" by "wodim". You may thus need to remove wodimn and >> create a symlink "wodim" that points to cdrecord. >On gentoo this is done automatically. If you'd read the post before >just going into auto-rant mode you'd have noticed that with cdrecord >it was burning fine but messing up the paths, so it can't be just a >case of not putting links in. cdrecord has nothing to do with paths. cdrecord and wodim simply take bytes off the disk and burn them onto the dvd. The path names are a concern of mkisofs. That is what assembles the stuff you tell it to burn and makes a single iso file. That is what contains path names, etc. Now it sounds like you did not tell it to use the appropriate rock-ridge/joliet extention to make the iso. >I also burned a dual-layer 8 gig DVD+R with it last night, worked a >treat including verifying so brasero appears to fill my needs fine, >but rather puzzlingly only works properly with wodim and not cdrecord. If you could list the symptoms again, it would be useful to debugging. nd "treats path names differently " is not a symptom. |