Delicious Library 2 released
in [UK Mac]
|
Prev: G5 fans
Next: iChat wierdness
From: Ian Robinson on 21 Jun 2008 15:37 On Sun, 1 Jun 2008 20:30:37 +0100, Ian McCall wrote (in article <6agbmtF361228U1(a)mid.individual.net>): > Have just tried out the demo - got to agree, with the details view > fixed in that configuration it's entirely useless to me and no upgrade > to v1.x at all. Indeed it's a sizeable decrease in usefulness. > > I really don't understand this use of vertical space on machines that > are pretty much exclusively widescreen these days. I have more > horizontal space to use than vertical, so it would seem sensible to > make use of it instead of trying to cram it into my smallish vertical > space instead. I emailed Delicious Monster today asking if it was possible to move the details pane back to the right, or if it was possible to view the info in a separate window, not not below the shelf view. Here is the response: >> Not right now, there isn't, but we'll probably be moving it back since no >> one >> likes it on the bottom. Happy days. BTW - version 2.0.1 fixes the NULL references to Amazon UK. Ian -- Ian Robinson, Belfast, UK <http://www.canicula.com/wp/>
From: Chris Ridd on 21 Jun 2008 15:54 On 2008-06-21 20:37:57 +0100, Ian Robinson <junk(a)canicula.invalid> said: > I emailed Delicious Monster today asking if it was possible to move the > details pane back to the right, or if it was possible to view the info in a > separate window, not not below the shelf view. Here is the response: > >>> Not right now, there isn't, but we'll probably be moving it back since no >>> one >>> likes it on the bottom. > > Happy days. BTW - version 2.0.1 fixes the NULL references to Amazon UK. Inded, that's good news though none of the bugs I've raised have been fixed. Did you see the DL2 review in today's MacUser? 2 mice only out of 5, which I thought was a bit harsh. Cheers, Chris
From: Ian Robinson on 21 Jun 2008 16:01 On Sat, 21 Jun 2008 20:54:16 +0100, Chris Ridd wrote (in article <6c54j8F3ejencU1(a)mid.individual.net>): > Did you see the DL2 review in today's MacUser? 2 mice only out of 5, > which I thought was a bit harsh. Depends which version the reviewed. 2.0 was bad. 2.0.1 is better. Ian -- Ian Robinson, Belfast, UK <http://www.canicula.com/wp/>
From: Chris Ridd on 21 Jun 2008 16:07 On 2008-06-21 21:01:38 +0100, Ian Robinson <junk(a)canicula.invalid> said: > On Sat, 21 Jun 2008 20:54:16 +0100, Chris Ridd wrote > (in article <6c54j8F3ejencU1(a)mid.individual.net>): > >> Did you see the DL2 review in today's MacUser? 2 mice only out of 5, >> which I thought was a bit harsh. > > Depends which version the reviewed. 2.0 was bad. 2.0.1 is better. > > Ian 2.0.1 only got updated this morning though, so I guess MacUser would have been hard pushed to review it, print the mag, and get it into the shops by 10am. Cheers, Chris
From: Ian Robinson on 21 Jun 2008 16:12
On Sat, 21 Jun 2008 21:07:29 +0100, Chris Ridd wrote (in article <6c55c1F3e5fh6U1(a)mid.individual.net>): > 2.0.1 only got updated this morning though, so I guess MacUser would > have been hard pushed to review it, print the mag, and get it into the > shops by 10am. In that case the 2 mice was charitable! Ian -- Ian Robinson, Belfast, UK <http://www.canicula.com/wp/> |