Prev: count(*) performance improvement ideas
Next: Lessons from commit fest
From: Simon Riggs on 23 Jun 2008 18:20

On Mon, 2008-06-23 at 15:52 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> CVS HEAD w/patch savings
>
> pg_database_size('postgres') 4439752 4071112 8.3%
> pg_relation_size('pg_class_relname_nsp_index') 57344 40960 28%
> pg_relation_size('pg_proc_proname_args_nsp_index') 319488 204800 35%
>
> Cutting a third off the size of a system index has got to be worth
> something, but is it worth a hack as ugly as this one?

Not doing it would be more ugly, unless there is some negative
side-effect?

--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support


--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(a)postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: count(*) performance improvement ideas
Next: Lessons from commit fest