Different Implementations of VLIW .
|
Prev: The Mark Thorson FAQ: Read all about this LIAR, BULLY, THUG, CYBERSTALKER and HARASSER
Next: The Mark Robert Thorson FAQ: Read all about this LIAR, BULLY, THUG, CYBERSTALKER and HARASSER
From: Ripunjay Tripathi on 8 Apr 2008 14:45 Different Implementations of the same VLIW architecture may not be binary-compatible with each other. I am looking for explaination on the above line. Regards, Ripunjay Tripathi Mr Nick Maclaren is requested to NOT TO BOTHER reading this and do some other useful job, if in hand.
From: Terje Mathisen on 8 Apr 2008 15:21 Ripunjay Tripathi wrote: > Different Implementations of the same VLIW architecture may not be > binary-compatible with each other. > > I am looking for explaination on the above line. > > Regards, > Ripunjay Tripathi > > Mr Nick Maclaren is requested to NOT TO BOTHER reading this and do > some other useful job, if in hand. In that case we'll have to answer on his behalf: Have you ever considered the canonical way to gain knowledge, that is to study? You know, where you read the available literature, then sit down and think? Terje -- - <Terje.Mathisen(a)hda.hydro.com> "almost all programming can be viewed as an exercise in caching"
From: Del Cecchi on 8 Apr 2008 19:25 "Ripunjay Tripathi" <ripunjay.tripathi(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:6d5c7197-880a-4b00-9212-1d40e61de0f1(a)n1g2000prb.googlegroups.com... > Different Implementations of the same VLIW architecture may not be > binary-compatible with each other. > > I am looking for explaination on the above line. > > > > > > Regards, > Ripunjay Tripathi > > Mr Nick Maclaren is requested to NOT TO BOTHER reading this and do > some other useful job, if in hand. On behalf of Nick.... Bite me. My answer... Let me count the ways.... The binary encodings could be different The handling of interrupts could be different. Hint.... think of all the x86 implementations. Are they binary compatible? Really? Without switches? del
From: Ripunjay Tripathi on 8 Apr 2008 22:39 On Apr 9, 12:21 am, Terje Mathisen <terje.mathi...(a)hda.hydro.com> wrote: > Ripunjay Tripathi wrote: > > Different Implementations of the same VLIW architecture may not be > > binary-compatible with each other. > > > I am looking for explaination on the above line. > > > Regards, > > Ripunjay Tripathi > > > Mr Nick Maclaren is requested to NOT TO BOTHER reading this and do > > some other useful job, if in hand. > > In that case we'll have to answer on his behalf: > > Have you ever considered the canonical way to gain knowledge, that is to > study? > > You know, where you read the available literature, then sit down and think? > > Terje > -- > - <Terje.Mathi...(a)hda.hydro.com> > "almost all programming can be viewed as an exercise in caching" Any single line of yours didnt helped me. Do you think, that I am giving any exams and asking you guys for answers of the question paper ??? What you said "to study and think is very correct" but then you are in prejudice. Importance of single line from a guru (that is mix of theory and experience) can give me a good direction, else plz tell me if I should leave this group Regards, Ripunjay Tripathi
From: Ripunjay Tripathi on 8 Apr 2008 22:42
On Apr 9, 4:25 am, "Del Cecchi" <delcecchioftheno...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > "Ripunjay Tripathi" <ripunjay.tripa...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > news:6d5c7197-880a-4b00-9212-1d40e61de0f1(a)n1g2000prb.googlegroups.com... > > > Different Implementations of the same VLIW architecture may not be > > binary-compatible with each other. > > > I am looking for explaination on the above line. > > > Regards, > > Ripunjay Tripathi > > > Mr Nick Maclaren is requested to NOT TO BOTHER reading this and do > > some other useful job, if in hand. > > On behalf of Nick.... > Bite me. > > My answer... > > Let me count the ways.... > > The binary encodings could be different > The handling of interrupts could be different. > > Hint.... think of all the x86 implementations. Are they binary > compatible? Really? Without switches? > > del Thanx Del |