|
From: mackerr on 4 May 2008 11:46 On May 4, 7:22 am, ddf...(a)gmail.com wrote: > > > Well, this is what I was saying - the default ETH port is to run PC > application not to send audio over - I think. For sending audio I need > expansion card (EtherSound or CobraNet) and interface in other end. > I'll contact someone from Yamaha techs and get everything clear. > > Einars Yes, the built in Ethernet port does not transport audio. To send 32 channels of audio back and forth you would need 2 cards in each console. They could be EtherSound, CobraNet, Optocore, Aviom64, RocknNet, or probably some I've forgotten, but each card can only send and receive 16 channels. Mac
From: bob urz on 5 May 2008 10:30 ddfflv(a)gmail.com wrote: > On 3 Maijs, 20:31, mackerr <mack...(a)aol.com> wrote: > > >>.... you can route all your audio via CAT5, >>the FOH mixing would either have to take place in the FOH mixer, OR >>you would have to use a computer to remote control the stage console. >>You cannot remote control an LS9 from another LS9 AFAIK. > > > Well, this is what I was saying - the default ETH port is to run PC > application not to send audio over - I think. For sending audio I need > expansion card (EtherSound or CobraNet) and interface in other end. > I'll contact someone from Yamaha techs and get everything clear. > > Einars We just had symphony pops in our hall with the music of STYX and Dennis DeYoung. Two VI-6's came off the truck (very neat little package) We ran two cat five's from stage rack to FOH. At a casual look, here were guys doing this sharing digitally and running cat Five FOH. Well, all was not as it seemed. It was cat 5 to FOH all right, but they did a passive split at monitor position with a separate stage rack for both the FOH and MOnitor VI6. They seemed to think this way they could both trim the gains and not have to fight over who has control of the pre's. Fact or fantasy, that's what these guys thought. Bob
|
Pages: 1 Prev: more on confused signals april 20 Next: What the Pro's Don't Do |