From: Richard Maine on
Mike Rosenberg <mikePOST(a)TOGROUPmacconsult.com> wrote:

> Paul Fuchs <paulfuchs(a)porkain'tkosher.oink> wrote:
>
> > Not trying to be rude, but there was a thread a few months ago covering
> > this in detail.
>
> You mean this thread?
>
> http://preview.tinyurl.com/62cxew
>
> It was a long time ago, over 5 weeks, and he may never have even read
> it. ;-)

After all, it isn't as though the two threads were started by the same
OP. Um... err... well, scratch that. :-)

--
Richard Maine | Good judgement comes from experience;
email: last name at domain . net | experience comes from bad judgement.
domain: summertriangle | -- Mark Twain
From: Paul Fuchs on
Mike Rosenberg <mikePOST(a)TOGROUPmacconsult.com> wrote:

> Paul Fuchs <paulfuchs(a)porkain'tkosher.oink> wrote:
>
> > Not trying to be rude, but there was a thread a few months ago covering
> > this in detail.
>
> You mean this thread?
>
> http://preview.tinyurl.com/62cxew
>
> It was a long time ago, over 5 weeks, and he may never have even read
> it. ;-)

Since AES was the OP in both instances, I would surmise that he was
aware of the thread and not satisfied with the results.
--
Never believe anything until it's officially denied.
From: Jolly Roger on
In article <1ijjt4c.1diwi9k18r2o5fN%paulfuchs(a)porkain'tkosher.oink>,
paulfuchs(a)porkain'tkosher.oink (Paul Fuchs) wrote:

> Mike Rosenberg <mikePOST(a)TOGROUPmacconsult.com> wrote:
>
> > Paul Fuchs <paulfuchs(a)porkain'tkosher.oink> wrote:
> >
> > > Not trying to be rude, but there was a thread a few months ago covering
> > > this in detail.
> >
> > You mean this thread?
> >
> > http://preview.tinyurl.com/62cxew
> >
> > It was a long time ago, over 5 weeks, and he may never have even read
> > it. ;-)
>
> Since AES was the OP in both instances, I would surmise that he was
> aware of the thread and not satisfied with the results.

Cry me a river...

--
Please send all responses to the relevant news group rather than directly
to me, as E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my very hungry
SPAM filter. Due to Google's refusal to prevent spammers from posting
messages through their servers, I often ignore posts from Google Groups.
You'll need to use a real news reader if you want me to see your posts.

JR
From: AES on
In article <1ijjt4c.1diwi9k18r2o5fN%paulfuchs(a)porkain'tkosher.oink>,
paulfuchs(a)porkain'tkosher.oink (Paul Fuchs) wrote:

> Since AES was the OP in both instances, I would surmise that he was
> aware of the thread and not satisfied with the results.

A fair surmise. And sometimes -- in Usenet, and in marriage -- things
do get better the second time around.
From: John Albert on
RE:
<< or is the "U3" stuff in some kind of separate chip that
can't be erased? >>

I don't believe there's any way to get rid of the U3 stuff
UNLESS you take the flash drive to a PC running Windows and
delete it that way. Until you do that, the U3 partition will
appear on your Mac desktop and even Disk Utility won't be
able to get rid of it.

I had the same problems when I picked up a Sandisk 4gig
flash drive. My solution was to take it back to the Circuit
City where I bought it, and have the tech guy there plug it
into a Windows box and run the routine (I think it's
actually one of the U3 applications) that removes the U3
partition. Once completed, the U3 partition is gone and the
U3 software is stored in a folder on the flash drive. I then
was able to use Disk Utility to do a complete
re-initialization to Mac format, after which the U3 stuff
was finally gone for good.

- John