Exim & RFC compliant
in [Postfix]
|
From: Jerry on 20 Jul 2010 15:39 I have been having an argument with an associate of mine who uses Exim for his company's mail server. He claims that Exim is totally compliant and that Postfix users claim otherwise to simply poison users against using Exim. I have used Postfix for 4 years and would never dream of using another MTA. My question would be in what way is Exim not RFC compliant? -- Jerry ✌ postfix-user(a)seibercom.net _____________________________________________________________________ TO REPORT A PROBLEM see http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html#mail TO (UN)SUBSCRIBE see http://www.postfix.org/lists.html Williams and Holland's Law: If enough data is collected, anything may be proven by statistical methods.
From: Noel Jones on 20 Jul 2010 15:57 On 7/20/2010 2:39 PM, Jerry wrote: > I have been having an argument with an associate of mine who uses Exim > for his company's mail server. He claims that Exim is totally compliant > and that Postfix users claim otherwise to simply poison users against > using Exim. I have used Postfix for 4 years and would never dream of > using another MTA. > > My question would be in what way is Exim not RFC compliant? > I'm sure it's not worth arguing about. Pick another topic. If I couldn't use postfix, I'd probably pick Exim. -- Noel Jones
From: Wietse Venema on 20 Jul 2010 16:07 Jerry: > I have been having an argument with an associate of mine who uses Exim > for his company's mail server. He claims that Exim is totally compliant > and that Postfix users claim otherwise to simply poison users against > using Exim. I have used Postfix for 4 years and would never dream of > using another MTA. > > My question would be in what way is Exim not RFC compliant? RFC 2034 (SMTP enhanced status codes), RFC 3461-4 (delivery status notifications), RFC 1652 (8-bit MIME including 8->7bit conversion) are among the differences. Wietse
|
Pages: 1 Prev: UTF8 header matching problem Next: Postfix queue on ramdisk: Insufficient system storage |