Prev: Using SRL16 with reset
Next: need recommendation for PCB fab & BGA assembly vendor, I'm in SF bay area
From: climber.tim on 6 May 2008 20:12
On May 7, 12:11 am, austin <aus...(a)xilinx.com> wrote:
> Why?
>
> What is it you are trying to show, prove, or do?
>
> It would be nice to know.

It is most cost-optimal for crypto-tasks, if I'm correct, of course.
Like it was done there:
http://www.copacobana.org/faq.html
From: Gavin Scott on 6 May 2008 21:12
climber.tim(a)gmail.com wrote:
> It is most cost-optimal for crypto-tasks, if I'm correct, of course.
> Like it was done there:
> http://www.copacobana.org/faq.html

Ah, ok then, 120 Spartan starter kits and a bigger roll of duct tape :)

For something so massively parallel and where each FPGA presumably
spends almost all of its time operating independently, I would think
some cheap off-the-shelf single-FPGA module in quantity might actually
be the easiest way to go. Probably not a problem to hook up 120 USB
devices to a PC to control them or whatever. Might get a little warm
though.

G.
 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: Using SRL16 with reset
Next: need recommendation for PCB fab & BGA assembly vendor, I'm in SF bay area