Finite Relativism (FR) book
in [Relativity]
|
From: Phil Bouchard on 15 Dec 2009 13:28 The latest version of the book has many textual corrections, but the core mathematics remain the same: https://www.createspace.com/3370163 As we all know FR maps the entire Universe into neat equations covering all of the following: - GPS - Particle momentum - Hubble Sphere - Dark Matter - Perihelion precession - Bending of light The latter was found to be exactly the same as to what is predicted by General Relativity, in the same circumstances. Thank you, -Phil NB: "Sam Wormley" was removed by request and so is "Doug" for having no last name.
From: eric gisse on 15 Dec 2009 13:42 Phil Bouchard wrote: > The latest version of the book has many textual corrections, but the > core mathematics remain the same: > https://www.createspace.com/3370163 > > As we all know FR maps the entire Universe into neat equations covering > all of the following: > > - GPS > - Particle momentum > - Hubble Sphere > - Dark Matter > - Perihelion precession > - Bending of light > > The latter was found to be exactly the same as to what is predicted by > General Relativity, in the same circumstances. "Publication Date: Jan 23 2009" But Phil, didn't we already establish that your theory doesn't correctly predict anything as well as the fact that the 'hubble sphere' is nothing more than a catchphrase you spout when cornered? Clearly you love the abuse otherwise you would not have came back, because nothing else has changed other than your mental state. > > > Thank you, > -Phil > > NB: "Sam Wormley" was removed by request and so is "Doug" for having no > last name.
From: Uncle Al on 15 Dec 2009 14:40 Phil Bouchard wrote: > > The latest version of the book has many textual corrections, but the > core mathematics remain the same: wrong. idiot http://www.mathpages.com/rr/s6-02/6-02.htm GR prediction for periastron precession scales as (semi-major axis)^(-3), as observed for Mercury perihelion precession and deeply relativistic periastron precessions such as http://arxiv.org/abs/0909.2861 DI Herculis anomalous orbital precession Science 303(5661) 1143;1153 (2004) http://arXiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0401086 http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0312071 <http://relativity.livingreviews.org/Articles/lrr-2005-7/index.html> <http://skyandtelescope.com/news/article_1473_1.asp> http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0609417 http://www.oakland.edu/physics/mog29/mog29.pdf http://www.physics.mcgill.ca/~bretonr/doublepulsar/ Binary pulsar PSR J0737-3039A/B, 16.8995 deg/yr periastron advance idiot -- Uncle Al http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/ (Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals) http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz4.htm
From: Phil Bouchard on 15 Dec 2009 14:46 Uncle Al wrote: > > wrong. > > idiot Rational numbers -> GR -> Irrational numbers Retarded. [...]
From: Sam Wormley on 15 Dec 2009 14:51
On 12/15/09 1:46 PM, Phil Bouchard wrote: > > Rational numbers -> GR -> Irrational numbers > Christ Phil--learn some mathematics! Why do you bloody your nose here? |