From: Steffen Klassert on 5 Jul 2010 10:00
On Mon, Jul 05, 2010 at 09:43:57PM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 05, 2010 at 05:35:32PM +0400, Dan Kruchinin wrote:
> > > Both cases should be handled in the same way. So we could just
> > > stop the instance if the cpumasks do not intersect, and enable
> > > it as soon as they do intersect again. The padata instance would
> > > refuse to do anything as long as the cpumasks do not intersect,
> > > but it is still in a consistent state. Let me add the infrastructure
> > > to handle this, then you can use it with your patches.
> > Ok, get it.
> So I should wait for another patch, right?
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/