From: anfei on
Hi Andrew,

On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 01:07:57PM +0800, anfei zhou wrote:
> The cache alias problem will happen if the changes of user shared mapping
> is not flushed before copying, then user and kernel mapping may be mapped
> into two different cache line, it is impossible to guarantee the coherence
> after iov_iter_copy_from_user_atomic. So the right steps should be:
> flush_dcache_page(page);
> kmap_atomic(page);
> write to page;
> kunmap_atomic(page);
> flush_dcache_page(page);
> More precisely, we might create two new APIs flush_dcache_user_page and
> flush_dcache_kern_page to replace the two flush_dcache_page accordingly.
>
> Here is a snippet tested on omap2430 with VIPT cache, and I think it is
> not ARM-specific:
> int val = 0x11111111;
> fd = open("abc", O_RDWR);
> addr = mmap(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED, fd, 0);
> *(addr+0) = 0x44444444;
> tmp = *(addr+0);
> *(addr+1) = 0x77777777;
> write(fd, &val, sizeof(int));
> close(fd);
> The results are not always 0x11111111 0x77777777 at the beginning as expected.
>
Is this a real bug or not necessary to support?

Thanks,
Anfei.

> Signed-off-by: Anfei <anfei.zhou(a)gmail.com>
> ---
> fs/fuse/file.c | 3 +++
> mm/filemap.c | 3 +++
> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/fuse/file.c b/fs/fuse/file.c
> index c18913a..a9f5e13 100644
> --- a/fs/fuse/file.c
> +++ b/fs/fuse/file.c
> @@ -828,6 +828,9 @@ static ssize_t fuse_fill_write_pages(struct fuse_req *req,
> if (!page)
> break;
>
> + if (mapping_writably_mapped(mapping))
> + flush_dcache_page(page);
> +
> pagefault_disable();
> tmp = iov_iter_copy_from_user_atomic(page, ii, offset, bytes);
> pagefault_enable();
> diff --git a/mm/filemap.c b/mm/filemap.c
> index 96ac6b0..07056fb 100644
> --- a/mm/filemap.c
> +++ b/mm/filemap.c
> @@ -2196,6 +2196,9 @@ again:
> if (unlikely(status))
> break;
>
> + if (mapping_writably_mapped(mapping))
> + flush_dcache_page(page);
> +
> pagefault_disable();
> copied = iov_iter_copy_from_user_atomic(page, i, offset, bytes);
> pagefault_enable();
> --
> 1.6.3.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
From: Andrew Morton on
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 21:33:08 +0800 anfei <anfei.zhou(a)gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Andrew,
>
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 01:07:57PM +0800, anfei zhou wrote:
> > The cache alias problem will happen if the changes of user shared mapping
> > is not flushed before copying, then user and kernel mapping may be mapped
> > into two different cache line, it is impossible to guarantee the coherence
> > after iov_iter_copy_from_user_atomic. So the right steps should be:
> > flush_dcache_page(page);
> > kmap_atomic(page);
> > write to page;
> > kunmap_atomic(page);
> > flush_dcache_page(page);
> > More precisely, we might create two new APIs flush_dcache_user_page and
> > flush_dcache_kern_page to replace the two flush_dcache_page accordingly.
> >
> > Here is a snippet tested on omap2430 with VIPT cache, and I think it is
> > not ARM-specific:
> > int val = 0x11111111;
> > fd = open("abc", O_RDWR);
> > addr = mmap(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED, fd, 0);
> > *(addr+0) = 0x44444444;
> > tmp = *(addr+0);
> > *(addr+1) = 0x77777777;
> > write(fd, &val, sizeof(int));
> > close(fd);
> > The results are not always 0x11111111 0x77777777 at the beginning as expected.
> >
> Is this a real bug or not necessary to support?

Bug. If variable `addr' has type int* then the contents of that file
should be 0x11111111 0x77777777. You didn't tell us what the contents
were in the incorrect case, but I guess it doesn't matter.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
From: Russell King - ARM Linux on
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 11:58:14AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 21:33:08 +0800 anfei <anfei.zhou(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Andrew,
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 01:07:57PM +0800, anfei zhou wrote:
> > > The cache alias problem will happen if the changes of user shared mapping
> > > is not flushed before copying, then user and kernel mapping may be mapped
> > > into two different cache line, it is impossible to guarantee the coherence
> > > after iov_iter_copy_from_user_atomic. So the right steps should be:
> > > flush_dcache_page(page);
> > > kmap_atomic(page);
> > > write to page;
> > > kunmap_atomic(page);
> > > flush_dcache_page(page);
> > > More precisely, we might create two new APIs flush_dcache_user_page and
> > > flush_dcache_kern_page to replace the two flush_dcache_page accordingly.
> > >
> > > Here is a snippet tested on omap2430 with VIPT cache, and I think it is
> > > not ARM-specific:
> > > int val = 0x11111111;
> > > fd = open("abc", O_RDWR);
> > > addr = mmap(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED, fd, 0);
> > > *(addr+0) = 0x44444444;
> > > tmp = *(addr+0);
> > > *(addr+1) = 0x77777777;
> > > write(fd, &val, sizeof(int));
> > > close(fd);
> > > The results are not always 0x11111111 0x77777777 at the beginning as expected.
> > >
> > Is this a real bug or not necessary to support?
>
> Bug. If variable `addr' has type int* then the contents of that file
> should be 0x11111111 0x77777777. You didn't tell us what the contents
> were in the incorrect case, but I guess it doesn't matter.

FYI, from a previous email from anfei:

0x44444444 0x77777777
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
From: anfei zhou on
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 3:58 AM, Andrew Morton
<akpm(a)linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 21:33:08 +0800 anfei <anfei.zhou(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Andrew,
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 01:07:57PM +0800, anfei zhou wrote:
>> > The cache alias problem will happen if the changes of user shared mapping
>> > is not flushed before copying, then user and kernel mapping may be mapped
>> > into two different cache line, it is impossible to guarantee the coherence
>> > after iov_iter_copy_from_user_atomic. �So the right steps should be:
>> > � � flush_dcache_page(page);
>> > � � kmap_atomic(page);
>> > � � write to page;
>> > � � kunmap_atomic(page);
>> > � � flush_dcache_page(page);
>> > More precisely, we might create two new APIs flush_dcache_user_page and
>> > flush_dcache_kern_page to replace the two flush_dcache_page accordingly.
>> >
>> > Here is a snippet tested on omap2430 with VIPT cache, and I think it is
>> > not ARM-specific:
>> > � � int val = 0x11111111;
>> > � � fd = open("abc", O_RDWR);
>> > � � addr = mmap(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED, fd, 0);
>> > � � *(addr+0) = 0x44444444;
>> > � � tmp = *(addr+0);
>> > � � *(addr+1) = 0x77777777;
>> > � � write(fd, &val, sizeof(int));
>> > � � close(fd);
>> > The results are not always 0x11111111 0x77777777 at the beginning as expected.
>> >
>> Is this a real bug or not necessary to support?
>
> Bug. �If variable `addr' has type int* then the contents of that file
> should be 0x11111111 0x77777777. �You didn't tell us what the contents
> were in the incorrect case, but I guess it doesn't matter.
>
Sorry, I didn't give the details, here is the old thread with more details:
http://linux.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/Kernel/2010-01/msg07124.html

Regards,
Anfei.
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior on
* Russell King - ARM Linux | 2010-01-25 20:00:04 [+0000]:

>On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 11:58:14AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
>> On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 21:33:08 +0800 anfei <anfei.zhou(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi Andrew,
>> >
>> > On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 01:07:57PM +0800, anfei zhou wrote:
>> > > The cache alias problem will happen if the changes of user shared mapping
>> > > is not flushed before copying, then user and kernel mapping may be mapped
>> > > into two different cache line, it is impossible to guarantee the coherence
>> > > after iov_iter_copy_from_user_atomic. So the right steps should be:
>> > > flush_dcache_page(page);
>> > > kmap_atomic(page);
>> > > write to page;
>> > > kunmap_atomic(page);
>> > > flush_dcache_page(page);
>> > > More precisely, we might create two new APIs flush_dcache_user_page and
>> > > flush_dcache_kern_page to replace the two flush_dcache_page accordingly.
>> > >
>> > > Here is a snippet tested on omap2430 with VIPT cache, and I think it is
>> > > not ARM-specific:
>> > > int val = 0x11111111;
>> > > fd = open("abc", O_RDWR);
>> > > addr = mmap(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED, fd, 0);
>> > > *(addr+0) = 0x44444444;
>> > > tmp = *(addr+0);
>> > > *(addr+1) = 0x77777777;
>> > > write(fd, &val, sizeof(int));
>> > > close(fd);
>> > > The results are not always 0x11111111 0x77777777 at the beginning as expected.
>> > >
>> > Is this a real bug or not necessary to support?
>>
>> Bug. If variable `addr' has type int* then the contents of that file
>> should be 0x11111111 0x77777777. You didn't tell us what the contents
>> were in the incorrect case, but I guess it doesn't matter.
>
>FYI, from a previous email from anfei:
>
>0x44444444 0x77777777

I just wanted to query what the status of this patch is. This patch
seems to fix a real bug which causes a test suite to fail on ARM [0].
The test suite passes on my VIVT ARM with this patch.

[0] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=524003

Sebastian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/