GPU Supercomputer - 300 TFLOPs
in [Embedded]
|
Prev: Chinese Microphone - China Chinese Microphone Manufacturer
Next: Any low cost solution for flash programming on PowerPC 405GP JTAG?
From: AirRaid on 22 Apr 2008 18:00 (Google Translated) In France, the Grand National Equipment Intensive Computing (Genci) striking hard since his first supercomputer, one of the first machine of its kind to use the GPU processing for calculation. According to our information, the 1068 processors are indeed Nehalem eight of hearts, and 48 modules are GPU solutions from NVIDIA Tesla. This will be in addition to a new generation of Tesla, with a very high probability of the GT200 chip controllers, and even several for each module (we imagine two, as in the current solutions Tesla NVIDIA). In this machine, all the CPU is supposed to produce a powerful theoretical 103 Tflops, up from 192 Tflops for GPU. With 96 against GPU 1068 CPU, it is already clear domination of the GPU on the CPU intensive computing, thanks to its multiple parallel processors flow. http://www.google.com/translate?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.pcinpact.com%2Factu%2Fnews%2F43165-premier-supercalculateur-GPU-France-Tesla.htm&langpair=fr%7Cen&hl=en&ie=UTF8
From: Phil Weldon on 22 Apr 2008 21:09 'AirRaid' wrote, in part: > > (Google Translated) > > In France, the Grand National Equipment Intensive Computing (Genci) > striking hard since his first supercomputer, one of the first machine > of its kind to use the GPU processing for calculation. > > According to our information, the 1068 processors are indeed Nehalem > eight of hearts, and 48 modules are GPU solutions from NVIDIA Tesla. > This will be in addition to a new generation of Tesla, with a very > high probability of the GT200 chip controllers, and even several for > each module (we imagine two, as in the current solutions Tesla > NVIDIA). > > In this machine, all the CPU is supposed to produce a powerful > theoretical 103 Tflops, up from 192 Tflops for GPU. With 96 against > GPU 1068 CPU, it is already clear domination of the GPU on the CPU > intensive computing, thanks to its multiple parallel processors flow. _____ This and similar posts are a good argument for filtering out Googlegroups postings. Why do you continue to post this kind of article without proper attribution? And crosspost to boot? And never have anything of your own to contribute? And, for this particular post, use a perfectly terrible translation? Considering you had to use a Google translation, how did you ever decide whether the original article was WORTH posting? If you can't add value, don't post. Especially don't crosspost. Phil Weldon "AirRaid" <AirRaidJet(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:3b426698-1352-46fe-afa5-5cb58f72db3c(a)d1g2000hsg.googlegroups.com... > > (Google Translated) > > In France, the Grand National Equipment Intensive Computing (Genci) > striking hard since his first supercomputer, one of the first machine > of its kind to use the GPU processing for calculation. > > According to our information, the 1068 processors are indeed Nehalem > eight of hearts, and 48 modules are GPU solutions from NVIDIA Tesla. > This will be in addition to a new generation of Tesla, with a very > high probability of the GT200 chip controllers, and even several for > each module (we imagine two, as in the current solutions Tesla > NVIDIA). > > In this machine, all the CPU is supposed to produce a powerful > theoretical 103 Tflops, up from 192 Tflops for GPU. With 96 against > GPU 1068 CPU, it is already clear domination of the GPU on the CPU > intensive computing, thanks to its multiple parallel processors flow. > > http://www.google.com/translate?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.pcinpact.com%2Factu%2Fnews%2F43165-premier-supercalculateur-GPU-France-Tesla.htm&langpair=fr%7Cen&hl=en&ie=UTF8
From: Jack Klein on 22 Apr 2008 21:31 On Tue, 22 Apr 2008 21:09:15 -0400, "Phil Weldon" <not.disclosed(a)example.com> wrote in comp.arch.embedded: [snip spam] > This and similar posts are a good argument for filtering out Googlegroups > postings. Yes, and it's an even better argument for NOT RESPONDING to usenet spam, and ESPECIALLY NOT QUOTING THE ENTIRE SPAM PAYLOAD in all of the cross-posted groups. Spammers rarely read the groups they abuse, and even if this one does, he/she/it will certainly ignore your rant. In the meantime you have DOUBLED his exposure. In fact, this idiot was caught by my filters, and I would never have seen his drivel at all had you not replied and quoted it.
From: Phil Weldon on 22 Apr 2008 21:46
'Jack Klein' wrote, in part: > Yes, and it's an even better argument for NOT RESPONDING to usenet > spam, and ESPECIALLY NOT QUOTING THE ENTIRE SPAM PAYLOAD in all of the > cross-posted groups. _____ 'AirRaid' is not a spammer, and the post is not spam. The transgression is NOT that he posted the URL of the poorly translated webpage (see my original post.) I quoted because it illustrates the problem 'AirRaid' presents. And how is THAT different from your post that lengthens the thread? Sometimes you just have describe a problem to get it fixed. Phil Weldon "Jack Klein" <jackklein(a)spamcop.net> wrote in message news:a64t04hg3bbolnghqkcn7p9lbkhclqt6n1(a)4ax.com... > On Tue, 22 Apr 2008 21:09:15 -0400, "Phil Weldon" > <not.disclosed(a)example.com> wrote in comp.arch.embedded: > > [snip spam] > >> This and similar posts are a good argument for filtering out Googlegroups >> postings. > > Yes, and it's an even better argument for NOT RESPONDING to usenet > spam, and ESPECIALLY NOT QUOTING THE ENTIRE SPAM PAYLOAD in all of the > cross-posted groups. > > Spammers rarely read the groups they abuse, and even if this one does, > he/she/it will certainly ignore your rant. In the meantime you have > DOUBLED his exposure. > > In fact, this idiot was caught by my filters, and I would never have > seen his drivel at all had you not replied and quoted it. |