Georgie
in [UK Mac]
|
Prev: wmv files
Next: Opera and Jobcentreplus
From: Sara Kirk on 23 Sep 2005 17:22 In article <sw-853679.21485423092005(a)mail.network-analysis.ltd.uk>, Sak Wathanasin <sw(a)network-analysis.ltd.uk> wrote: > In article <230920051932505309%sarakirk(a)blueyonder.co.uk>, > Sara Kirk <sarakirk(a)blueyonder.co.uk> wrote: > > > Nope, pedantry is open to all. > > Didn't you used to get sent to Reading Goal for that? Not wilde about the prospect. -- Sara iChat: sarakirk (AIM) So, what are you going to do? Sucker me to death?
From: Paul Russell on 23 Sep 2005 18:15 Sak Wathanasin wrote: > In article <230920051932505309%sarakirk(a)blueyonder.co.uk>, > Sara Kirk <sarakirk(a)blueyonder.co.uk> wrote: > > >>Nope, pedantry is open to all. > > > Didn't you used to get sent to Reading Goal for that? > I'm not sure whether Reading FC have ever actually scored (unless you include own goals) ? Paul
From: Graeme Wall on 24 Sep 2005 03:32 In message <43347e93$0$14348$db0fefd9(a)news.zen.co.uk> Paul Russell <prussell(a)sonic.net> wrote: > Sak Wathanasin wrote: > > > In article <230920051932505309%sarakirk(a)blueyonder.co.uk>, > > Sara Kirk <sarakirk(a)blueyonder.co.uk> wrote: > > > > > >>Nope, pedantry is open to all. > > > > > > Didn't you used to get sent to Reading Goal for that? > > > > I'm not sure whether Reading FC have ever actually scored (unless you > include own goals) ? > Give that man an Oscar. -- Graeme Wall My genealogy website: <http://www.greywall.demon.co.uk/genealogy/index.html>
From: Bruce Horrocks on 24 Sep 2005 15:03 In message <43347e93$0$14348$db0fefd9(a)news.zen.co.uk>, Paul Russell <prussell(a)sonic.net> writes >>>Nope, pedantry is open to all. >> Didn't you used to get sent to Reading Goal for that? >> > >I'm not sure whether Reading FC have ever actually scored (unless you >include own goals) ? Oi, the religious thread is over there ---> -- Bruce Horrocks Surrey England <firstname>@<surname>.plus.com -- fix the obvious for email
From: Jon B on 25 Sep 2005 06:17
Flavio Matani <flavio_mataniTAKETHISBITOUT(a)mac.com> wrote: > Richard Tobin <richard(a)cogsci.ed.ac.uk> wrote: > > > In article <dh085c$a7g$1(a)gemini.csx.cam.ac.uk>, > > Richard P. Grant <rpg(a)mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk> wrote: > > > > >I'm assuming that was spam. If Monsieur Mansfield-Devine actually had > > >something to contribute then he should realize that binaries are > > >explicitly forbidden here > > > > There weren't any binaries, just two text attachments. Though why anyone > > would use an attachment for the main text of an article is a mystery. > > The same sort of people who email you from Microsoft Word and declare > for the hundredth time that that is what everybody uses, what's the > problem.... Or those that embed a jpg/bmp etc in a word file which ends up making it 500k rather than just sending the original picture in the first place. -- Jon B real email to usenet at jonbradbury dot com |