Prev: Anyone else pissed off at Dell US prices versus here?
Next: whats a fair price?
From: ^Tems^ on 2 Sep 2008 01:44
Some claim it is a copy of Firefox while google claim it is a ground up
build.

Less of a memory hog apparently
From: terryc on 2 Sep 2008 20:13
On Wed, 03 Sep 2008 07:48:36 +1000, SG1 wrote:


> NONE I don't & won't Google. I use alternatives.

Which search engines do you rcommend?

From: Rob on 4 Sep 2008 07:48
ArseClown wrote:
> terryc <newssixspam-spam(a)woa.com.au> typed in message
> news:pan.2008.09.03.00.13.50.907891(a)woa.com.au:
>
>> On Wed, 03 Sep 2008 07:48:36 +1000, SG1 wrote:
>>
>>
>>> NONE I don't & won't Google. I use alternatives.
>> Which search engines do you rcommend?
>>
>>
>
>
> http://www.ixquick.com/

Its clean and simple,
From: MisterE on 5 Sep 2008 04:07

"^Tems^" <stevebrooks13(a)live.com> wrote in message
news:6i425nFose2cU1(a)mid.individual.net...
> Some claim it is a copy of Firefox while google claim it is a ground up
> build.
>
> Less of a memory hog apparently

Is it opposite day? They use completely different layout engines so its not
a copy. It uses more memory than firefox does, because it spawns new
processes for every tab/windows etc.

I have found it faster for everything, especially for java obviously. Its
only lacking in some features and add-ons that will probably come. IMO its
pretty much instantly better than firefox, just the speed factor. Use it
then use firefox, feels slow in comparison.


From: Clocky on 18 Sep 2008 23:47

"^Tems^" <stevebrooks13(a)live.com> wrote in message
news:6i425nFose2cU1(a)mid.individual.net...
> Some claim it is a copy of Firefox while google claim it is a ground up
> build.
>
> Less of a memory hog apparently

Much faster then FF, much much faster.

Looks to be the go for general browsing.


 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: Anyone else pissed off at Dell US prices versus here?
Next: whats a fair price?