Prev: Can script determine if window.onload has already fired?
Next: get opacity value
From: David Mark on 19 Nov 2009 16:38
On Nov 19, 1:11 pm, Matt Kruse <m...(a)thekrusefamily.com> wrote:
> On Nov 18, 8:36 pm, David Mark <dmark.cins...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Nov 18, 9:10 pm, Garrett Smith <dhtmlkitc...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Instead, focus on something smaller. You might choose a format such as:
> > >    I saw a problem [description]
> > >    This is bad because [demonstration/evidence]
> > >    Here is the relevant part [formatted code]
> > >    Recap on problem
> > Of course not.  There's a problem on practically every line.  The
> > whole thing is a waste of time.  That's the point.
>
> Your rants are unreadable, because I can't even distinguish between
> their code and your complaints.

I don't care if you can read them.

>
> When I can figure out where your comments are, they read like a script
> for Statler and Waldorf, the two muppets in the theater balcony that
> insult and complain about everything. Just little snide remarks thrown
> out with some vague context and no supporting evidence or arguments.

Who has time to re-hash the same old bullshit. We had most of these
same discussions over the last couple of years with regard to your
favorite library.

>
> Even if you have valid criticisms, they are all lost because of your
> laziness in snipping, quoting, and organizing your thoughts for
> comprehension.

Rubbish. The organization is the code. It is what it is. :)

>
> At least your new anti-Closure crusade is a welcome change from your
> anti-jQuery crusade.

You are such a waste of time.

>
> Anxiously awaiting the awesome new Dojo,

I bet you are. ;)

 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: Can script determine if window.onload has already fired?
Next: get opacity value