From: Bob Friesenhahn on
I am the maintainer for the image processing package known as
GraphicsMagick. A few weeks ago, the FreeBSD port maintainer for
GraphicsMagick became upset and quit. This leaves me a bit concerned
since my project is left in limbo.

As of yesterday, the current GraphicsMagick releases are 1.1.14
(legacy stable) and 1.2.3 (current stable). FreeBSD only offers
1.1.12. There are important security fixes (what Debian classifies as
"grave") contained in these releases.

I see that someone has picked up the ImageMagick port. Can someone
please take responsibility for the GraphicsMagick port so that
GraphicsMagick users (e.g. KDE) are not left behind? Maintaining the
GraphicsMagick port is similar to maintaining the ImageMagick port
(except for being much easier).

It is important that FreeBSD ports make it over the hurdle and move up
to the 1.2.X baseline. There are four additional years of development
and bug fixing in the 1.2 branch. Due to time constraints, usually
only fixes for serious issues are back-ported to the 1.1 branch.

Thanks,

Bob
======================================
Bob Friesenhahn
bfriesen(a)simple.dallas.tx.us, http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen/
GraphicsMagick Maintainer, http://www.GraphicsMagick.org/

_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports(a)freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe(a)freebsd.org"

From: "Greg Larkin" on
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-freebsd-ports(a)freebsd.org
> [mailto:owner-freebsd-ports(a)freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Bob Friesenhahn
>
> I am the maintainer for the image processing package known as
> GraphicsMagick. A few weeks ago, the FreeBSD port maintainer
> for GraphicsMagick became upset and quit. This leaves me a
> bit concerned since my project is left in limbo.
>
> As of yesterday, the current GraphicsMagick releases are
> 1.1.14 (legacy stable) and 1.2.3 (current stable). FreeBSD
> only offers 1.1.12. There are important security fixes (what
> Debian classifies as
> "grave") contained in these releases.
>
> I see that someone has picked up the ImageMagick port. Can
> someone please take responsibility for the GraphicsMagick
> port so that GraphicsMagick users (e.g. KDE) are not left
> behind? Maintaining the GraphicsMagick port is similar to
> maintaining the ImageMagick port (except for being much easier).
>
> It is important that FreeBSD ports make it over the hurdle
> and move up to the 1.2.X baseline. There are four additional
> years of development and bug fixing in the 1.2 branch. Due to
> time constraints, usually only fixes for serious issues are
> back-ported to the 1.1 branch.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Bob
> ======================================
> Bob Friesenhahn
> bfriesen(a)simple.dallas.tx.us,
> http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen/
> GraphicsMagick Maintainer, http://www.GraphicsMagick.org/
>

Hi Bob,

I just submitted a PR to update GraphicsMagick to v1.2.3 in the FreeBSD
ports tree, and I cc'd you on it.

All of the post-install tests passed, but if you or anyone else runs into
problems with the port, let me know.

Regards,
Greg Larkin
SourceHosting.net, LLC
http://www.sourcehosting.net/



_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports(a)freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe(a)freebsd.org"