HACKING SUSE LINUX 10.1
in [Suse]
|
Prev: nokia pc suite in linux
Next: apt source error on kde
From: John Bailo on 3 Jun 2006 10:18 http://www.thejemreport.com/mambo/content/view/254/1/ "HACKING SUSE LINUX 10.1 Written by Jem Matzan When you're done installing SUSE Linux 10.1 OSS, your desktop system is not complete. You might still need support for Java programs, MP3 audio files, and browser plugins for Macromedia Flash, Adobe Acrobat, RealPlayer, and Windows Media Video. You may also want to add support for playing DVD videos on your computer, and to try out the new XGL graphical toys. Here's how to effectively make SUSE Linux 10.1 into the perfect desktop OS." -- Texeme Textcasting powers http://www.you-read-it-here-first.com
From: Dog Fart on 4 Jun 2006 04:33 On Sat, 03 Jun 2006 07:18:44 -0700, John Bailo wrote: > "HACKING SUSE LINUX 10.1 > Written by Jem Matzan Thanks for this. Still wondering after reading - why upgrade from 10.0 to 10.1?
From: Roy Schestowitz on 4 Jun 2006 04:44 __/ [ Dog Fart ] on Sunday 04 June 2006 09:33 \__ > On Sat, 03 Jun 2006 07:18:44 -0700, John Bailo wrote: > >> "HACKING SUSE LINUX 10.1 >> Written by Jem Matzan > > Thanks for this. > > Still wondering after reading - why upgrade from 10.0 to 10.1? This has been discussed _a lot_ elsewhere. I suggest you see, e.g.: http://groups.google.com/group/alt.os.linux.suse/search?group=alt.os.linux.suse&q=suse+10+upgrade&qt_g=1&searchnow=Search+this+group
From: Dog Fart on 4 Jun 2006 04:50 On Sun, 04 Jun 2006 09:44:48 +0100, Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups(a)schestowitz.com> (allegedly) wrote: > This has been discussed _a lot_ elsewhere Thanks. Yes I have seen it hear as well. Just a rhetorical question - if SuSe bring out say 10.2 which improves on 10.1; are there normally any issues upgrading two versions ahead (by this I mean from 10.0 to 10.2)?
From: Roy Schestowitz on 4 Jun 2006 04:56
__/ [ Dog Fart ] on Sunday 04 June 2006 09:50 \__ > On Sun, 04 Jun 2006 09:44:48 +0100, Roy Schestowitz > <newsgroups(a)schestowitz.com> (allegedly) wrote: > >> This has been discussed _a lot_ elsewhere > > Thanks. Yes I have seen it hear as well. > > Just a rhetorical question - if SuSe bring out say 10.2 which improves on > 10.1; are there normally any issues upgrading two versions ahead (by this I > mean from 10.0 to 10.2)? Good question, to which I'd love to hear the question myself. Some Web-based software requires staged upgrades. While we're at it, I have my own question to add: Can I upgrade from 8.1 and 9.3 to 10.1 while retaining most things, leaving them in tact? |