From: Joe L on

"bob urz" <sound(a)inetnebr.com> wrote in message
news:1216138595_12992(a)isp.n...
> Eeyore wrote:
>>
>> George's ProSound Company wrote:
>>
>>
>>>"liquidator" <mikeh(a)mad.scientist.com> wrot
>>>
>>>>I suppose someone will now suggest a microphone is an electrical
>>>>network...
>>>
>>>we beat this dead horse a few months ago with arnii and eyesore claiming
>>>that everyfucking thing is a filter
>>
>>
>> Everything *IS* a filter. Even your car's suspension.
>>
>> You have to be scientifically incompetent to think otherwise.
>>
>> Graham
>>
> Of course you are technical correct. A loud speaker can be modeled
> (as theile and small told us and set the standard)
>
> So can a microphone. kind of boarders on more control systems
> theory with mechanical limits and resonances involved.
>
> BUT, i think most of us think of a filter as something that acts
> on a source. Translation: Most of us don't think of a transducer
> as a filter in the true sense. Technically, it is. Rather than think
> of a transducer as a filter, i think the generally thinking is the
> treat it as a imperfect voltage or current source.
>
> Its sort of stupid to argue ad nauseum about if it is, or is not....
> What you or i think won't change the laws of Physics.
>
>
> Arny, there are much better things to waist hours of bandwidth arguing
> over....
>
> bob

This has strayed so far past my initial post, such as what are some of the
ways & favorite settings operators use the VARIABLE filters. Unless one is
gonna change mic's during a perfomance, that is totally a FIXED source, no
matter that it's not flat. Sure proximity effect can change that source, but
it's still not a VARIABLE filter that can change passively without yelling
at the performer, or passing them a different mic.

It's like calling a woman a vase case she's technically made up of a lot of
water.;-P But it really does miss the point, entirely.

JL






From: liquidator on

"bob urz" <sound(a)inetnebr.com> wrote in message
news:1216138595_12992(a)isp.n...
> Eeyore wrote:
> >
> > George's ProSound Company wrote:
> >
> >
> >>"liquidator" <mikeh(a)mad.scientist.com> wrot
> >>
> >>>I suppose someone will now suggest a microphone is an electrical
> >>>network...
> >>
> >>we beat this dead horse a few months ago with arnii and eyesore
claiming
> >>that everyfucking thing is a filter
> >
> >
> > Everything *IS* a filter. Even your car's suspension.
> >
> > You have to be scientifically incompetent to think otherwise.
> >
> > Graham
> >
> Of course you are technical correct. A loud speaker can be modeled
> (as theile and small told us and set the standard)
>
> So can a microphone. kind of boarders on more control systems
> theory with mechanical limits and resonances involved.
>
> BUT, i think most of us think of a filter as something that acts
> on a source. Translation: Most of us don't think of a transducer
> as a filter in the true sense. Technically, it is. Rather than think
> of a transducer as a filter, i think the generally thinking is the
> treat it as a imperfect voltage or current source.
>
> Its sort of stupid to argue ad nauseum about if it is, or is not....
> What you or i think won't change the laws of Physics.
>
>
> Arny, there are much better things to waist hours of bandwidth arguing
> over....
>
> bob
>
The whole thing reminds me of the guy who sent ten puns to friends, in the
hope one would make them laugh.

No pun in ten did.


From: Phildo on

"Ron(UK)" <ron(a)lunevalleyaudio.com> wrote in message
news:w_OdnXmIgpRlOuHVnZ2dnUVZ8sHinZ2d(a)bt.com...
> How come these ancient old threads have been resurected? They were put to
> bed months ago!

I got a new news server and am catching up on posts I missed. Got another
2000-odd to go but no idea when I'll get round to them.

Server retention goes back 3 or 4 years !!!

Phildo


From: Eeyore on


Joe L wrote:

> This has strayed so far past my initial post, such as what are some of the
> ways & favorite settings operators use the VARIABLE filters. Unless one is
> gonna change mic's during a perfomance, that is totally a FIXED source, no
> matter that it's not flat. Sure proximity effect can change that source, but
> it's still not a VARIABLE filter that can change passively without yelling
> at the performer, or passing them a different mic.
>
> It's like calling a woman a vase case she's technically made up of a lot of
> water.;-P But it really does miss the point, entirely.

How about starting a new more explicitly named thread ?

Graham

From: Eeyore on


Phildo wrote:

> "Ron(UK)" <ron(a)lunevalleyaudio.com> wrote
>
> > How come these ancient old threads have been resurected? They were put to
> > bed months ago!
>
> I got a new news server and am catching up on posts I missed. Got another
> 2000-odd to go but no idea when I'll get round to them.
>
> Server retention goes back 3 or 4 years !!!

GOD HELP US !

Graham