HPF
in [Live Sound]
|
From: FatBoySlimFast on 21 Jul 2008 18:58 On Sun, 20 Jul 2008 21:26:30 -0400, "liquidator" <mikeh(a)mad.scientist.com> wrote: >I have not so much issue believing it >happened as the statement Army lasted >3 months. I still say no way. Interesting that you can make such a confident statement about something which you have no certain knowledge. >Not that important who is right- at least to me... So the point of posting your reply is what? >But I'm Agnostic on the matter. I suggest you lookup the definition of agnostic. You're about as far away from agnostic as it's possible to be. You've made your mind up. And you seem to have no interest in finding out the facts. The word you are looking for is prejudiced. You might be right about the 3 months. You might be wrong. I don't recall. But to have an opinion and to be uninterested in whether it has any basis in truth is prejudice. You might well claim to have good grounds to believe what you believe based on past experience but you cannot claim that you are agnostic and pretend to take the moral high ground! SteveW
From: Phildo on 23 Jul 2008 03:23 "Arny Krueger" <arnyk(a)hotpop.com> wrote in message news:5L2dndG5f9jm_BnVnZ2dnUVZ_gGdnZ2d(a)comcast.com... > How low do you have to be to attack someone who has been dead for almost > 10 years? Still not low enough that I can 't look down on you from a great height. Don't you get it Arny? People don't want you here. Why not just go and end all the arguing? Phildo
From: Arny Krueger on 23 Jul 2008 07:27
"Phildo" <Phil(a)phildo.net> wrote in message news:Z%Ahk.11198$ec5.5573(a)newsfe30.ams2 > Don't you get it Arny? People don't want you here. Why > not just go and end all the arguing? I got to get you into a few more killfiles, like I already have. ;-) |