From: Arny Krueger on
"Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote in
message news:487992CC.38ADE6BC(a)hotmail.com
> "Ron(UK)" wrote:
>
>> Arny Krueger wrote:

>>> Proximity effect is an example of an acoustical filter.

>> How can an effect that boosts frequencies be described
>> as a filter?

>> Filters remove

> Sorry Ron, totally wrong. Filters can either cut or boost
> by design. Never heard of a 'peaking filter' for example ?

Just a friendly reminder about all-pass filters, which may neither cut nor
boost, but just change phase or timing.

Note that Steve Maki just posted:


www.national.com/an/AN/AN-779.pdf

From section 1.1:

"In circuit theory, a filter is an electrical network that alters the
amplitude and/or phase characteristics of a signal with respect to
frequency"

My definition, that I was repeatedly flamed at for posting:

"...anything that changes the frequency response is some kind of a filter."

I guess my problem is that I read too much.

I've also been working with audio filters for over 50 years. So that must be
my other problem - too much real-world experience.



From: liquidator on

"Steve Maki" <steve(a)nospam.com> wrote in message
news:v1ao74lj9fpp8lqsjsjppmobpu9trvhefp(a)4ax.com...
> On Sun, 13 Jul 2008 06:29:48 +0100, Eeyore
<rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> > Proximity effect is an example of an acoustical filter.
>
> >> How can an effect that boosts frequencies be described as a filter?
> >>
> >> Filters remove
>
> >Sorry Ron, totally wrong. Filters can either cut or boost by design.
> >Never heard of a 'peaking filter' for example ?
>
> www.national.com/an/AN/AN-779.pdf
>
> From section 1.1:
>
> "In circuit theory, a filter is an electrical network that alters the
> amplitude and/or phase characteristics of a signal with respect to
> frequency"
>
> It's a very informative filter primer. One should come away from it
> with the idea that the "gain", or lack of it, in a filter is a secondary,
> trivial characteristic.
>
> --
> Steve Maki

I suppose someone will now suggest a microphone is an electrical network...


From: George's ProSound Company on

"liquidator" <mikeh(a)mad.scientist.com> wrote in message
news:g5i8gm$b6c$1(a)aioe.org...
>
> "Steve Maki" <steve(a)nospam.com> wrote in message
> news:v1ao74lj9fpp8lqsjsjppmobpu9trvhefp(a)4ax.com...
>> On Sun, 13 Jul 2008 06:29:48 +0100, Eeyore
> <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >> > Proximity effect is an example of an acoustical filter.
>>
>> >> How can an effect that boosts frequencies be described as a filter?
>> >>
>> >> Filters remove
>>
>> >Sorry Ron, totally wrong. Filters can either cut or boost by design.
>> >Never heard of a 'peaking filter' for example ?
>>
>> www.national.com/an/AN/AN-779.pdf
>>
>> From section 1.1:
>>
>> "In circuit theory, a filter is an electrical network that alters the
>> amplitude and/or phase characteristics of a signal with respect to
>> frequency"
>>
>> It's a very informative filter primer. One should come away from it
>> with the idea that the "gain", or lack of it, in a filter is a secondary,
>> trivial characteristic.
>>
>> --
>> Steve Maki
>
> I suppose someone will now suggest a microphone is an electrical
> network...

we beat this dead horse a few months ago with arnii and eyesore claiming
that everyfucking thing is a filter
the air, the audience, the room, the parking lot
the street lamps, as everything effects sound in some way with thier
IDIOTIC brainless attempt to be right
they in fact have made everything on earth into a filter
its pointless to try to get through to them that a stop sign, is called a
stop sign, not a octangle
and there are things that are called filters, and other things that effect
sound which simply are not called filters
such as microphones

george
>
>


From: Ron(UK) on
liquidator wrote:
> "Steve Maki" <steve(a)nospam.com> wrote in message
> news:v1ao74lj9fpp8lqsjsjppmobpu9trvhefp(a)4ax.com...
>> On Sun, 13 Jul 2008 06:29:48 +0100, Eeyore
> <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> Proximity effect is an example of an acoustical filter.
>>>> How can an effect that boosts frequencies be described as a filter?
>>>>
>>>> Filters remove
>>> Sorry Ron, totally wrong. Filters can either cut or boost by design.
>>> Never heard of a 'peaking filter' for example ?
>> www.national.com/an/AN/AN-779.pdf
>>
>> From section 1.1:
>>
>> "In circuit theory, a filter is an electrical network that alters the
>> amplitude and/or phase characteristics of a signal with respect to
>> frequency"
>>
>> It's a very informative filter primer. One should come away from it
>> with the idea that the "gain", or lack of it, in a filter is a secondary,
>> trivial characteristic.
>>
>> --
>> Steve Maki
>
> I suppose someone will now suggest a microphone is an electrical network...
>
>

How come these ancient old threads have been resurected? They were put
to bed months ago!

Ron(UK)
From: Eeyore on


Steve Maki wrote:

> Eeyore wrote:
>
> >> > Proximity effect is an example of an acoustical filter.
>
> >> How can an effect that boosts frequencies be described as a filter?
> >>
> >> Filters remove
>
> >Sorry Ron, totally wrong. Filters can either cut or boost by design.
> >Never heard of a 'peaking filter' for example ?
>
> www.national.com/an/AN/AN-779.pdf
>
> From section 1.1:
>
> "In circuit theory, a filter is an electrical network that alters the
> amplitude and/or phase characteristics of a signal with respect to
> frequency"
>
> It's a very informative filter primer. One should come away from it
> with the idea that the "gain", or lack of it, in a filter is a secondary,
> trivial characteristic.

Never mind acoustic filters ! Ever heard of a 'bass trap' ?

Graham