From: houghi on
Terry Kayser wrote:
> Directly from the suse linux user guide book. "Its contents can be
> duplicated, either in part or in whole, provided that a copyright label
> is visibly located on each copy". My two lines (part of the manual)
> were copied from the administration guide, and I didn't have a copyright
> label visible. Therefore I broke the law. The "in part" is the tricky
> part. What does "in part" mean? One word? Ten words? 100 words?
> 1000 words?

No, you did not break the law. You were quoting and that is legal by
law. I agree that it is very tricky to know what amounts to quoting and
what amounts to copy right infringement. I think that we can safely say
that if you copy and paste a whole article that that is copying and not
quoting.

> Did you read hack12.txt? Here is the reason why it's perfectly legal to
> put this online.

Yes, I read it. Just wanted to point out that even if things are
copyrighted it CAN be put online. (and it is a darn fine read as well)

I will ant one more. Even when there is NO sign of a copyright, the work
is automatically copyrighted. So when I write an article or a book and
even NOT put a copyright notice in it, it still is copyrighted by me.

Ain't _that_ fun! :-D
--
houghi Please do not toppost http://houghi.org
You are about to enter another dimension, a dimension not only of
sight and sound but of mind. A journey into a wondrous land of
imagination. Next stop, Usenet