Prev: digital FM phenomena/question ????
Next: Changing interpolated delay line size
From: HardySpicer on 18 May 2010 15:07
On May 19, 12:43 am, Vladimir Vassilevsky <nos...(a)nowhere.com> wrote:
> HardySpicer wrote:
> > Used in FM before demodulation. Do they actually do any filtering
> > though apart from removing amplitude variations?
> > What I have seen is that for low SNRs (carrier to noise ratios) you
> > are better off without it! Many people have told me that too. For high
> > SNRs they are fine ie if you are connected to the ariel.
>
> Cretin. This is what the recent tread of phase-amplitude detectors was
> about. You didn't bother to understand a thing, although you stick your
> stupid noze into it.
>
> VLV

No need to be like that Vlad or we'll take you back to Transalvania...
From: Jerry Avins on 18 May 2010 15:35
On 5/18/2010 3:07 PM, HardySpicer wrote:
> On May 19, 12:43 am, Vladimir Vassilevsky<nos...(a)nowhere.com> wrote:
>> HardySpicer wrote:
>>> Used in FM before demodulation. Do they actually do any filtering
>>> though apart from removing amplitude variations?
>>> What I have seen is that for low SNRs (carrier to noise ratios) you
>>> are better off without it! Many people have told me that too. For high
>>> SNRs they are fine ie if you are connected to the ariel.
>>
>> Cretin. This is what the recent tread of phase-amplitude detectors was
>> about. You didn't bother to understand a thing, although you stick your
>> stupid noze into it.
>>
>> VLV
>
> No need to be like that Vlad or we'll take you back to Transalvania...

You might learn how to spell on the other side of the woods.

Jerry
--
"I view the progress of science as ... the slow erosion of the tendency
to dichotomize." --Barbara Smuts, U. Mich.
�����������������������������������������������������������������������
From: Dirk Bell on 18 May 2010 16:42
On May 18, 3:35 pm, Jerry Avins <j...(a)ieee.org> wrote:
> On 5/18/2010 3:07 PM, HardySpicer wrote:
>
> > On May 19, 12:43 am, Vladimir Vassilevsky<nos...(a)nowhere.com>  wrote:
> >> HardySpicer wrote:
> >>> Used in FM before demodulation. Do they actually do any filtering
> >>> though apart from removing amplitude variations?
> >>> What I have seen is that for low SNRs (carrier to noise ratios) you
> >>> are better off without it! Many people have told me that too. For high
> >>> SNRs they are fine ie if you are connected to the ariel.
>
> >> Cretin. This is what the recent tread of phase-amplitude detectors was
> >> about. You didn't bother to understand a thing, although you stick your
> >> stupid noze into it.
>
> >> VLV
>
> > No need to be like that Vlad or we'll take you back to Transalvania...
>
> You might learn how to spell on the other side of the woods.
>
> Jerry
> --
> "I view the progress of science as ... the slow erosion of the tendency
>   to dichotomize." --Barbara Smuts, U. Mich.
> ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯

Vlad or Tim?
From: Tim Wescott on 18 May 2010 16:59
Dirk Bell wrote:
> On May 18, 3:35 pm, Jerry Avins <j...(a)ieee.org> wrote:
>> On 5/18/2010 3:07 PM, HardySpicer wrote:
>>
>>> On May 19, 12:43 am, Vladimir Vassilevsky<nos...(a)nowhere.com> wrote:
>>>> HardySpicer wrote:
>>>>> Used in FM before demodulation. Do they actually do any filtering
>>>>> though apart from removing amplitude variations?
>>>>> What I have seen is that for low SNRs (carrier to noise ratios) you
>>>>> are better off without it! Many people have told me that too. For high
>>>>> SNRs they are fine ie if you are connected to the ariel.
>>>> Cretin. This is what the recent tread of phase-amplitude detectors was
>>>> about. You didn't bother to understand a thing, although you stick your
>>>> stupid noze into it.
>>>> VLV
>>> No need to be like that Vlad or we'll take you back to Transalvania...
>> You might learn how to spell on the other side of the woods.
>>
>> Jerry
>> --
>> "I view the progress of science as ... the slow erosion of the tendency
>> to dichotomize." --Barbara Smuts, U. Mich.
>> �����������������������������������������������������������������������
>
> Vlad or Tim?

Wait! How did I get pulled into this?

And I don't think "Transalvania" is "the other side of the woods". With
that "salvation" in there it's got to have some deep, possibly perverse,
religious meaning.

--
Tim Wescott
Control system and signal processing consulting
www.wescottdesign.com
From: HardySpicer on 19 May 2010 16:08
On May 19, 8:59 am, Tim Wescott <t...(a)seemywebsite.now> wrote:
> Dirk Bell wrote:
> > On May 18, 3:35 pm, Jerry Avins <j...(a)ieee.org> wrote:
> >> On 5/18/2010 3:07 PM, HardySpicer wrote:
>
> >>> On May 19, 12:43 am, Vladimir Vassilevsky<nos...(a)nowhere.com>  wrote:
> >>>> HardySpicer wrote:
> >>>>> Used in FM before demodulation. Do they actually do any filtering
> >>>>> though apart from removing amplitude variations?
> >>>>> What I have seen is that for low SNRs (carrier to noise ratios) you
> >>>>> are better off without it! Many people have told me that too. For high
> >>>>> SNRs they are fine ie if you are connected to the ariel.
> >>>> Cretin. This is what the recent tread of phase-amplitude detectors was
> >>>> about. You didn't bother to understand a thing, although you stick your
> >>>> stupid noze into it.
> >>>> VLV
> >>> No need to be like that Vlad or we'll take you back to Transalvania....
> >> You might learn how to spell on the other side of the woods.
>
> >> Jerry
> >> --
> >> "I view the progress of science as ... the slow erosion of the tendency
> >>   to dichotomize." --Barbara Smuts, U. Mich.
> >> ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
>
> > Vlad or Tim?
>
> Wait!  How did I get pulled into this?
>
> And I don't think "Transalvania" is "the other side of the woods".  With
> that "salvation" in there it's got to have some deep, possibly perverse,
> religious meaning.
>
> --
> Tim Wescott
> Control system and signal processing consultingwww.wescottdesign.com

Vampires
First  |  Prev  | 
Pages: 1 2
Prev: digital FM phenomena/question ????
Next: Changing interpolated delay line size