|
Prev: File dates for Fedora 7 question
Next: FC6 - GRUB help
From: Mike Rushton on 3 Jun 2007 12:55 Has anyone used CentOS ??? It is supposed to be based off of Red Hat. It seems to be getting popular.
From: General Schvantzkoph on 3 Jun 2007 13:14 On Sun, 03 Jun 2007 16:55:27 +0000, Mike Rushton wrote: > Has anyone used CentOS ??? > > It is supposed to be based off of Red Hat. > > > It seems to be getting popular. I'm running CentOS 5 on my compute servers. It's fine for headless servers. There is a quirk in the way it starts up the X server which makes it a less good choice for workstations. When CentOS 5 boots the X server doesn't come up. The work around is to do a ps -aux | grep X And then kill the process it finds. X will start immediately after you kill the zombie X process. I have two different systems that exhibit this problem, a old dual Xeon with built in ATI graphics, and an A64 laptop with Nvidia graphics.
From: Mike Rushton on 3 Jun 2007 15:35 I wonder if it supports 4 CPU's ??? I got the demo of RHEL Advanced Server 5 that I am probably gonna load next week. The Advanced Server supports 4 CPU's - it gives you the sockets or whatever thier called to run multiple CPU's on. I kind of liked the GUI that Red Hat 3 had - that was nice. It loaded easier than windows. The only thing is that w/ REHL AS you are buying some support too. General Schvantzkoph wrote: > On Sun, 03 Jun 2007 16:55:27 +0000, Mike Rushton wrote: > > >>Has anyone used CentOS ??? >> >>It is supposed to be based off of Red Hat. >> >> >>It seems to be getting popular. > > > I'm running CentOS 5 on my compute servers. It's fine for headless > servers. There is a quirk in the way it starts up the X server which > makes it a less good choice for workstations. When CentOS 5 boots the X > server doesn't come up. The work around is to do a > > ps -aux | grep X > > And then kill the process it finds. X will start immediately after you > kill the zombie X process. I have two different systems that exhibit this > problem, a old dual Xeon with built in ATI graphics, and an A64 laptop > with Nvidia graphics.
From: General Schvantzkoph on 3 Jun 2007 16:32 On Sun, 03 Jun 2007 19:35:28 +0000, Mike Rushton wrote: > I wonder if it supports 4 CPU's ??? > > I got the demo of RHEL Advanced Server 5 that I am probably gonna load > next week. The Advanced Server supports 4 CPU's - it gives you the > sockets or whatever thier called to run multiple CPU's on. > > I kind of liked the GUI that Red Hat 3 had - that was nice. It loaded > easier than windows. > > The only thing is that w/ REHL AS you are buying some support too. > It supports a lot more than 4 CPUs, you don't have to worry about that. The GUI is orders of magnitude better on RHEL 5/CentOS 5 then it was on RHEL3.
From: Mike Rushton on 3 Jun 2007 21:21
So the GUI will not start ??? General Schvantzkoph wrote: > On Sun, 03 Jun 2007 16:55:27 +0000, Mike Rushton wrote: > > >>Has anyone used CentOS ??? >> >>It is supposed to be based off of Red Hat. >> >> >>It seems to be getting popular. > > > I'm running CentOS 5 on my compute servers. It's fine for headless > servers. There is a quirk in the way it starts up the X server which > makes it a less good choice for workstations. When CentOS 5 boots the X > server doesn't come up. The work around is to do a > > ps -aux | grep X > > And then kill the process it finds. X will start immediately after you > kill the zombie X process. I have two different systems that exhibit this > problem, a old dual Xeon with built in ATI graphics, and an A64 laptop > with Nvidia graphics. |