From: Mike Rushton on
Has anyone used CentOS ???

It is supposed to be based off of Red Hat.


It seems to be getting popular.
From: General Schvantzkoph on
On Sun, 03 Jun 2007 16:55:27 +0000, Mike Rushton wrote:

> Has anyone used CentOS ???
>
> It is supposed to be based off of Red Hat.
>
>
> It seems to be getting popular.

I'm running CentOS 5 on my compute servers. It's fine for headless
servers. There is a quirk in the way it starts up the X server which
makes it a less good choice for workstations. When CentOS 5 boots the X
server doesn't come up. The work around is to do a

ps -aux | grep X

And then kill the process it finds. X will start immediately after you
kill the zombie X process. I have two different systems that exhibit this
problem, a old dual Xeon with built in ATI graphics, and an A64 laptop
with Nvidia graphics.
From: Mike Rushton on
I wonder if it supports 4 CPU's ???

I got the demo of RHEL Advanced Server 5 that I am probably gonna load
next week. The Advanced Server supports 4 CPU's - it gives you the
sockets or whatever thier called to run multiple CPU's on.

I kind of liked the GUI that Red Hat 3 had - that was nice. It loaded
easier than windows.

The only thing is that w/ REHL AS you are buying some support too.




General Schvantzkoph wrote:
> On Sun, 03 Jun 2007 16:55:27 +0000, Mike Rushton wrote:
>
>
>>Has anyone used CentOS ???
>>
>>It is supposed to be based off of Red Hat.
>>
>>
>>It seems to be getting popular.
>
>
> I'm running CentOS 5 on my compute servers. It's fine for headless
> servers. There is a quirk in the way it starts up the X server which
> makes it a less good choice for workstations. When CentOS 5 boots the X
> server doesn't come up. The work around is to do a
>
> ps -aux | grep X
>
> And then kill the process it finds. X will start immediately after you
> kill the zombie X process. I have two different systems that exhibit this
> problem, a old dual Xeon with built in ATI graphics, and an A64 laptop
> with Nvidia graphics.
From: General Schvantzkoph on
On Sun, 03 Jun 2007 19:35:28 +0000, Mike Rushton wrote:

> I wonder if it supports 4 CPU's ???
>
> I got the demo of RHEL Advanced Server 5 that I am probably gonna load
> next week. The Advanced Server supports 4 CPU's - it gives you the
> sockets or whatever thier called to run multiple CPU's on.
>
> I kind of liked the GUI that Red Hat 3 had - that was nice. It loaded
> easier than windows.
>
> The only thing is that w/ REHL AS you are buying some support too.
>

It supports a lot more than 4 CPUs, you don't have to worry about that.

The GUI is orders of magnitude better on RHEL 5/CentOS 5 then it was on
RHEL3.
From: Mike Rushton on
So the GUI will not start ???



General Schvantzkoph wrote:
> On Sun, 03 Jun 2007 16:55:27 +0000, Mike Rushton wrote:
>
>
>>Has anyone used CentOS ???
>>
>>It is supposed to be based off of Red Hat.
>>
>>
>>It seems to be getting popular.
>
>
> I'm running CentOS 5 on my compute servers. It's fine for headless
> servers. There is a quirk in the way it starts up the X server which
> makes it a less good choice for workstations. When CentOS 5 boots the X
> server doesn't come up. The work around is to do a
>
> ps -aux | grep X
>
> And then kill the process it finds. X will start immediately after you
> kill the zombie X process. I have two different systems that exhibit this
> problem, a old dual Xeon with built in ATI graphics, and an A64 laptop
> with Nvidia graphics.
 |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2
Prev: File dates for Fedora 7 question
Next: FC6 - GRUB help