Prev: javascript stopped working?
Next: How to define a namespace properly?
From: Evertjan. on 18 Jun 2008 16:48
MC wrote on 18 jun 2008 in comp.lang.javascript:

>
> "Evertjan." <exjxw.hannivoort(a)interxnl.net> wrote in message
> news:Xns9AC12CBAD96Beejj99(a)194.109.133.242...
>> MC wrote on 17 jun 2008 in comp.lang.javascript:
>>
>>> I thought this was a thread about getting client html sent back to
>>> the server. I don't give a rats fat behind about your legal opinion
>>> as it doesn't hold water here. Fact is, 'reasonable' and
>>> 'consistent' are key ideals of the law here....not perfection. Guess
>>> we are just not as good as you.
>>>
>>
>> To whom and to what are you responding?
>>
>> You seem to have a lot to learn about usenet posting.
>>
>> You seem angry, why? And at whom?

[please do not quote signatures on usenet]

> At whom???
> I'm not angry. Frustrated maybe. Instead of helping, you are concerned
> about criticizing my business.

I am not critisizing your business, I don't even know you have one.

As for helping, I think I am helping, but this is not a helpdesk, you are
not entitled to help and only that., this is usenet.

> I didn't ask for business help, I asked for a how to with javascript.

So? You got your answer: impossible.

Recapitulating:

Clientside browser Javascript cannot get the full html of a page, and
even if it would, it would be reconstructed from the DOM, and not show
the actual image representation, as that is also dependent on window
size, Browser settings, type end version, screen size, operating system,
and more.

> Instead of help, I got a ranting about
> legal issues, browsers, why something shouldn't be done, and rudeness.

Haha, you are angry. Be angry at yourself. You explained you needed it
for legal purposes.

> It seems that you think its ok to usenet post garbage like this.

That it is garbage is not what I hink, and it is not for you to decide
what is ok on usenet, that's what Netiquette is for.

Do you really think usenet is a helpdesk?

> I hope to not learn any of your behaviors about usenet posting.
> It seems that you are trolling more than helping
> and having fun doing it.

So what if so? you are the asking party and you do not want to hear an
answer that would really help you: that your quest is useless, because
sending the html back by javascript is impossible, that reconstructing
the html [that you cannot get back] to an image is not your requested
legal proof.

> I don't know why, as I know from other posts that you are
> knowledgeable about javascript.

So do not despair, lay down that frustration, just take up the many
advises I and others have posted here in this thread to make an
alternative approach.

.... and never, never think anymore this is a paid [or even unpaid]
helpdesk, were posting a Q gives you privileges on specifying what
answers you want or do not want. After all, this is usenet.

.... and yes, I have fun, fun in helping, but not to the expense of
leaving you the false idea that it is possible to do what you ask, when
it is not.

.... and your ideas about usenet are funny indeed.

--
Evertjan.
The Netherlands.
(Please change the x'es to dots in my emailaddress)
First  |  Prev  | 
Pages: 1 2 3
Prev: javascript stopped working?
Next: How to define a namespace properly?