How good / full proof are firewalls?
in [Firewalls]
|
Prev: Visit this site for the latest news and articles on Identity theft http://identitytheftbouncer.com/
Next: Error 80042109 on sending mails
From: dba on 8 Apr 2008 13:33 Can anyone give me a quick answer or direct me to a good neutral site?
From: Todd H. on 8 Apr 2008 13:55 dba <someone(a)someplace.org> writes: > Can anyone give me a quick answer or direct me to a good neutral > site? No. -- Todd H. http://www.toddh.net/
From: Ansgar -59cobalt- Wiechers on 8 Apr 2008 13:57 dba <someone(a)someplace.org> wrote: > Can anyone give me a quick answer or direct me to a good neutral site? They're as good as the vendor implements them and the administrator configures them. cu 59cobalt -- "If a software developer ever believes a rootkit is a necessary part of their architecture they should go back and re-architect their solution." --Mark Russinovich
From: Leythos on 8 Apr 2008 18:37
In article <47fbac56$0$16673$4c368faf(a)roadrunner.com>, someone(a)someplace.org says... > Can anyone give me a quick answer or direct me to a good neutral site? If you understand firewalls then you also understand that they only block what you create rules to block and those rules are only as good as the vendor's programmers make them. If you can pick it up new for under $300 then it's not much more than a simple NAT router pretending to be a firewall. -- - Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum. - Calling an illegal alien an "undocumented worker" is like calling a drug dealer an "unlicensed pharmacist" spam999free(a)rrohio.com (remove 999 for proper email address) |