From: Warren Block on
Tuxedo <tuxedo(a)> wrote:
> Usually, FreeBSD systems do not recognise the -h flag for the ls command,
> at least not those I 've been exposed to.

I've never had ls -lh not work on FreeBSD, but there are likely many
creative ways it could be broken.

What happens when you use -h? What does the man page say about ls?
uname -a?

> Does anyone here know how to get the result of ls -lh on a FreeBSD?

'ls -lh' is the normal way.

Warren Block * Rapid City, South Dakota * USA