|
Prev: simple usage of windows TAP-Win32 driver
Next: which is the hottest field in Embedded systems ,currently in market.
From: Jurgen Haan on 16 Apr 2008 09:41 Josef Moellers wrote: > Ignoramus15568 wrote: >> On 2008-04-15, Josef Moellers <josef.moellers(a)fujitsu-siemens.com> wrote: >>> Ignoramus30238 wrote: >>>> I have a ubuntu based server and a windows client. I have some SMB >>>> shares >>>> that I want to be read only and available without password (for anyone >>>> coming from legitimate IPs). >>>> My issue is that the ubuntu server insists on authenticating the user, >>>> even for read only shares. How can I make it acept anyone, without >>>> password? >>> Have you tried "guest ok = yes"? >>> >> >> Yes, at share level. > > I recall that some registry entry is required for this, but can't > remember which. > Maybe this triggers someone else's mind. > Back when we were still using a windows domain, I used to change registry on the new XP workstations to skip authentication, but I think it's machine authentication, and not so much user authentication (for domain-logon). [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\Netlogon\Parameters] "requiresignorseal"=dword:00000000 "signsecurechannel"=dword:00000000 Not sure if that is what you're looking for.
From: Ignoramus12441 on 16 Apr 2008 10:46
On 2008-04-16, Jurgen Haan <jurgen(a)fake.tld> wrote: > Josef Moellers wrote: >> Ignoramus15568 wrote: >>> On 2008-04-15, Josef Moellers <josef.moellers(a)fujitsu-siemens.com> wrote: >>>> Ignoramus30238 wrote: >>>>> I have a ubuntu based server and a windows client. I have some SMB >>>>> shares >>>>> that I want to be read only and available without password (for anyone >>>>> coming from legitimate IPs). >>>>> My issue is that the ubuntu server insists on authenticating the user, >>>>> even for read only shares. How can I make it acept anyone, without >>>>> password? >>>> Have you tried "guest ok = yes"? >>>> >>> >>> Yes, at share level. >> >> I recall that some registry entry is required for this, but can't >> remember which. >> Maybe this triggers someone else's mind. >> > > Back when we were still using a windows domain, I used to change > registry on the new XP workstations to skip authentication, but I think > it's machine authentication, and not so much user authentication (for > domain-logon). > > [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\Netlogon\Parameters] > "requiresignorseal"=dword:00000000 > "signsecurechannel"=dword:00000000 > > Not sure if that is what you're looking for. > No. I am done. Everything works now. I had to specify: guest account = sambauser security = share and create a fake user sambauser with /bin/false as shell. I am very happy. There are read only shares. So I could use a real account, but out of abundance of paranoia, I created a fake user, and ALSO made shares read only. i |