From: Leo on
I tried looking at the MS example and it confuses me especially after
reading the MSDN doco for FindText. I have been thinking abou going
about the operation using Karl's HookXP subclassing method to catch the
FINDMSGSTRING Message. Would that be an acceptable method?
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/267939 is the MS example

--
ClassicVB Users Regroup! comp.lang.basic.visual.misc
Free usenet access at http://www.eternal-september.org


From: MikeD on


"Leo" <ttdhead(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
news:i06sh3$h0n$1(a)news.eternal-september.org...
> I tried looking at the MS example and it confuses me especially after
> reading the MSDN doco for FindText. I have been thinking abou going about
> the operation using Karl's HookXP subclassing method to catch the
> FINDMSGSTRING Message. Would that be an acceptable method?
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/267939 is the MS example
>
> --


What do you find confusing? I mean, the KB article provides you sample code.
Have you tried running it and studying it?

--
Mike


From: Mayayana on
Is there some reason to prefer that over just
doing it yourself? You can make your own
Find/Replace window and search a textbox
yourself. What you've got there is just a convoluted
subclassing operation in order to use a system-
produced Find/Replace window. It's the sort of
thing that C++ programmers would have found
to be the easiest method before there was RAD
programming. After jumping through all those
hoops you're still just doing an InStr on the
textbox text.



|I tried looking at the MS example and it confuses me especially after
| reading the MSDN doco for FindText. I have been thinking abou going
| about the operation using Karl's HookXP subclassing method to catch the
| FINDMSGSTRING Message. Would that be an acceptable method?
| http://support.microsoft.com/kb/267939 is the MS example
|
| --
| ClassicVB Users Regroup! comp.lang.basic.visual.misc
| Free usenet access at http://www.eternal-september.org
|
|


From: Leo on
MikeD pretended :
>
> "Leo" <ttdhead(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:i06sh3$h0n$1(a)news.eternal-september.org...
>> I tried looking at the MS example and it confuses me especially after
>> reading the MSDN doco for FindText. I have been thinking abou going about
>> the operation using Karl's HookXP subclassing method to catch the
>> FINDMSGSTRING Message. Would that be an acceptable method?
>> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/267939 is the MS example
>>
>> --
>
>
> What do you find confusing? I mean, the KB article provides you sample code.
> Have you tried running it and studying it?

I got it running, but it goes in a totally different dirrection to the
msdn docs probably so as not to go into subclassing though.

--
ClassicVB Users Regroup! comp.lang.basic.visual.misc
Free usenet access at http://www.eternal-september.org


From: Leo on
Mayayana has brought this to us :
> Is there some reason to prefer that over just
> doing it yourself? You can make your own
> Find/Replace window and search a textbox
> yourself. What you've got there is just a convoluted
> subclassing operation in order to use a system-
> produced Find/Replace window. It's the sort of
> thing that C++ programmers would have found
> to be the easiest method before there was RAD
> programming. After jumping through all those
> hoops you're still just doing an InStr on the
> textbox text.
>
>
>
>> I tried looking at the MS example and it confuses me especially after
>> reading the MSDN doco for FindText. I have been thinking abou going
>> about the operation using Karl's HookXP subclassing method to catch the
>> FINDMSGSTRING Message. Would that be an acceptable method?
>> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/267939 is the MS example
>>
>> --
>> ClassicVB Users Regroup! comp.lang.basic.visual.misc
>> Free usenet access at http://www.eternal-september.org
>>
>>

The msdn docs say you should use the MS dialogs when they have one for
consistency which is what I want.

--
ClassicVB Users Regroup! comp.lang.basic.visual.misc
Free usenet access at http://www.eternal-september.org


 |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2
Prev: ListView Hit test
Next: Java's "readInt" to VB6