|
Prev: Accept & create calendars for someone else
Next: Printing more than 3 appointments on full month calendar
From: ABahr on 1 Jul 2008 14:31 I used both Labels (office locations) and Categories (meeting types) on our shared "meetings calendar". Not only did that color-code the calendar so viewers could easily see which meetings were put on at which office on any given day, but, we could sort by either meeting-type (Category) or Office location (Label). Now that we've upgraded to 2007, how do I do that? I've read that I cannot see both categories in list view; I can only view one or the other, for any appointment that has multiple categories. In 2003, I could sort by Category and see what label it was as well or vice versa. I have searched and found nothing addressing this, except what I cannot do. Am I the only one who used labels AND categories simultaneously!? There IS a work-around, right?
From: Michael Bauer [MVP - Outlook] on 2 Jul 2008 12:31
Why don't you use categories for both types of information? -- Best regards Michael Bauer - MVP Outlook : Outlook Categories? Category Manager Is Your Tool : VBOffice Reporter for Data Analysis & Reporting : <http://www.vboffice.net/product.html?pub=6&lang=en> Am Tue, 1 Jul 2008 11:31:15 -0700 schrieb ABahr: > I used both Labels (office locations) and Categories (meeting types) on our > shared "meetings calendar". Not only did that color-code the calendar so > viewers could easily see which meetings were put on at which office on any > given day, but, we could sort by either meeting-type (Category) or Office > location (Label). Now that we've upgraded to 2007, how do I do that? > > I've read that I cannot see both categories in list view; I can only view > one or the other, for any appointment that has multiple categories. In 2003, > I could sort by Category and see what label it was as well or vice versa. > > I have searched and found nothing addressing this, except what I cannot do. > Am I the only one who used labels AND categories simultaneously!? There IS a > work-around, right? |