|
From: stockDrover on 1 Nov 2007 09:55 #1: Missing component on IO panel. The CCMOS switch was missing. Just a 3 pin header sticking up. Nice QA. I should have known better but re-ordered for one more. #2: Won't power up. It endlessly cycles through 82.83/99. (Power supply). Another clue: If the MB found fault with the PSU, it should stop. It doesn't. ABit Forum Guys: "Your PSU is no good. Go buy an Antec EarthWatts 500 at Staples" I did. Sure enough, it gets past 82/83 and now hangs on "C1" (memory). Endless loops again. Abit Forum Guys: "Your memory is no good. Go get a cheap stick of RAM to boot with. Once you can get to the BIOS, change the RAM voltage to 2.1. Power down and put your memory back in. It will work fine." I almost fell for it. Then I wondered how I could get so many brand new "bad" components. Especially the RAM, a matched pair of CM2X024-6400C4 from Corsair. It *is* JEDEC compliant, and while one stick might be bad, the odds of two failures in the same package are pretty low. Then too, PSU is a brand new Antec TP3-550. How strange that another Antec fixes the problem. I ordered an ASus P5E. Guess what? My power supply is fine. My memory is rock solid. The board screams and is way nicer in every respect; even the supplied cables and connectors. The Abit IP35 Pro, IMO is too fussy to be worth owning. Everything has to be "just right". Too bad. In concept its a nice feature set. If you get it working, then there are a whole bunch of other issues that crop up. Double booting, vDroop, Some complaints about WD SATAII drives not working on IP35 boards at New Egg.... I don't have a great opinion of the Abit forum support posters. We have 36 years of standards promoting PC parts interoperability. I think hiding failures to comply with them is a disservice to ABit customers as well as the PC community at large. I can just see the Mac guy snickering. Hasta la Vista ABit, Stockdrover PS -I've been Asus/AMD powered for years. When I went looking for Intel, I skipped Asus because they have been AMD/NVidia heavy for years. I didn't think they'd play well with C2D and Intel Chipsets. I was wrong, wrong, wrong. Asus rocks. E6850/P5E/cm2x1024-6400c4(*2)/WD1600YS(*3)/nx8600gt-t2d256ez/P180B/ TP2-550/Raid5/Vista32
From: Folk on 1 Nov 2007 13:38 On Thu, 01 Nov 2007 13:55:38 -0000, stockDrover <StockDrover(a)gmail.com> wrote: >#1: Missing component on IO panel. The CCMOS switch was missing. Just >a 3 pin header sticking up. > >Nice QA. I should have known better but re-ordered for one more. > >#2: Won't power up. It endlessly cycles through 82.83/99. (Power >supply). > >Another clue: If the MB found fault with the PSU, it should stop. It >doesn't. > >ABit Forum Guys: "Your PSU is no good. Go buy an Antec EarthWatts 500 >at Staples" > >I did. Sure enough, it gets past 82/83 and now hangs on "C1" (memory). >Endless loops again. > >Abit Forum Guys: "Your memory is no good. Go get a cheap stick of RAM >to boot with. Once you can get to the BIOS, change the RAM voltage to >2.1. Power down and put your memory back in. It will work fine." > >I almost fell for it. Then I wondered how I could get so many brand >new "bad" components. Especially the RAM, a matched pair of >CM2X024-6400C4 from Corsair. It *is* JEDEC compliant, and while one >stick might be bad, the odds of two failures in the same package are >pretty low. Then too, PSU is a brand new Antec TP3-550. How strange >that another Antec fixes the problem. > >I ordered an ASus P5E. Guess what? My power supply is fine. My memory >is rock solid. The board screams and is way nicer in every respect; >even the supplied cables and connectors. > >The Abit IP35 Pro, IMO is too fussy to be worth owning. Everything has >to be "just right". Too bad. In concept its a nice feature set. If you >get it working, then there are a whole bunch of other issues that crop >up. Double booting, vDroop, Some complaints about WD SATAII drives not >working on IP35 boards at New Egg.... > >I don't have a great opinion of the Abit forum support posters. We >have 36 years of standards promoting PC parts interoperability. I >think hiding failures to comply with them is a disservice to ABit >customers as well as the PC community at large. I can just see the Mac >guy snickering. > >Hasta la Vista ABit, > >Stockdrover > >PS -I've been Asus/AMD powered for years. When I went looking for >Intel, I skipped Asus because they have been AMD/NVidia heavy for >years. I didn't think they'd play well with C2D and Intel Chipsets. I >was wrong, wrong, wrong. Asus rocks. > >E6850/P5E/cm2x1024-6400c4(*2)/WD1600YS(*3)/nx8600gt-t2d256ez/P180B/ >TP2-550/Raid5/Vista32 Meh. I have an IP35 Pro here and it runs great. Sadly, the Abit forum has a few anal-retentive quacks that birddog every post and spew bad advice. The IP35 Pro does have a problem with memory that requires > 2.0 volts to run properly, but to be honest those modules are running out of spec anyway so it's hard to fault Abit. IOW a reset causes the mobo's memory voltage to default to 1.8 (standard voltage) but if your module requires 2.1 to operate then you're pretty much screwed.
From: Folk on 1 Nov 2007 13:51 On Thu, 01 Nov 2007 13:55:38 -0000, stockDrover <StockDrover(a)gmail.com> wrote: >#1: Missing component on IO panel. The CCMOS switch was missing. Just >a 3 pin header sticking up. > >Nice QA. I should have known better but re-ordered for one more. > >#2: Won't power up. It endlessly cycles through 82.83/99. (Power >supply). > >Another clue: If the MB found fault with the PSU, it should stop. It >doesn't. > >ABit Forum Guys: "Your PSU is no good. Go buy an Antec EarthWatts 500 >at Staples" > >I did. Sure enough, it gets past 82/83 and now hangs on "C1" (memory). >Endless loops again. > >Abit Forum Guys: "Your memory is no good. Go get a cheap stick of RAM >to boot with. Once you can get to the BIOS, change the RAM voltage to >2.1. Power down and put your memory back in. It will work fine." > >I almost fell for it. Then I wondered how I could get so many brand >new "bad" components. Especially the RAM, a matched pair of >CM2X024-6400C4 from Corsair. It *is* JEDEC compliant, and while one >stick might be bad, the odds of two failures in the same package are >pretty low. Then too, PSU is a brand new Antec TP3-550. How strange >that another Antec fixes the problem. > >I ordered an ASus P5E. Guess what? My power supply is fine. My memory >is rock solid. The board screams and is way nicer in every respect; >even the supplied cables and connectors. > >The Abit IP35 Pro, IMO is too fussy to be worth owning. Everything has >to be "just right". Too bad. In concept its a nice feature set. If you >get it working, then there are a whole bunch of other issues that crop >up. Double booting, vDroop, Some complaints about WD SATAII drives not >working on IP35 boards at New Egg.... > >I don't have a great opinion of the Abit forum support posters. We >have 36 years of standards promoting PC parts interoperability. I >think hiding failures to comply with them is a disservice to ABit >customers as well as the PC community at large. I can just see the Mac >guy snickering. > >Hasta la Vista ABit, > >Stockdrover > >PS -I've been Asus/AMD powered for years. When I went looking for >Intel, I skipped Asus because they have been AMD/NVidia heavy for >years. I didn't think they'd play well with C2D and Intel Chipsets. I >was wrong, wrong, wrong. Asus rocks. > >E6850/P5E/cm2x1024-6400c4(*2)/WD1600YS(*3)/nx8600gt-t2d256ez/P180B/ >TP2-550/Raid5/Vista32 Heh. Just moments after posting my reply, I saw where Anandtech http://www.anandtech.com/mb/showdoc.aspx?i=3142 had proclaimed the IP35 Pro the greatest thing since sliced bread. Go figure. <g>
From: frodo on 2 Nov 2007 12:30 Folk <Folk(a)folk.com> wrote: > Heh. Just moments after posting my reply, I saw where Anandtech > http://www.anandtech.com/mb/showdoc.aspx?i=3142 > had proclaimed the IP35 Pro the greatest thing since sliced bread. Go > figure. <g> That just means that the sample that Anand got had zero-defects; not everyone is that lucky, unfortunately. Abit's are like VW's: when they work you love them, but there are days...
From: novmber on 9 Nov 2007 16:43 i have crucial 2.2v in mine - found it iles better with a bios upgrade to v11 i think 2.2 - is that old hat now ? what would you recommend for good "safe" performance ? "Folk" <Folk(a)folk.com> wrote in message news:fv2ki3142mk3jed1d39kt2ahbtts22pfoc(a)4ax.com... On Thu, 01 Nov 2007 13:55:38 -0000, stockDrover <StockDrover(a)gmail.com> wrote: >#1: Missing component on IO panel. The CCMOS switch was missing. Just >a 3 pin header sticking up. > >Nice QA. I should have known better but re-ordered for one more. > >#2: Won't power up. It endlessly cycles through 82.83/99. (Power >supply). > >Another clue: If the MB found fault with the PSU, it should stop. It >doesn't. > >ABit Forum Guys: "Your PSU is no good. Go buy an Antec EarthWatts 500 >at Staples" > >I did. Sure enough, it gets past 82/83 and now hangs on "C1" (memory). >Endless loops again. > >Abit Forum Guys: "Your memory is no good. Go get a cheap stick of RAM >to boot with. Once you can get to the BIOS, change the RAM voltage to >2.1. Power down and put your memory back in. It will work fine." > >I almost fell for it. Then I wondered how I could get so many brand >new "bad" components. Especially the RAM, a matched pair of >CM2X024-6400C4 from Corsair. It *is* JEDEC compliant, and while one >stick might be bad, the odds of two failures in the same package are >pretty low. Then too, PSU is a brand new Antec TP3-550. How strange >that another Antec fixes the problem. > >I ordered an ASus P5E. Guess what? My power supply is fine. My memory >is rock solid. The board screams and is way nicer in every respect; >even the supplied cables and connectors. > >The Abit IP35 Pro, IMO is too fussy to be worth owning. Everything has >to be "just right". Too bad. In concept its a nice feature set. If you >get it working, then there are a whole bunch of other issues that crop >up. Double booting, vDroop, Some complaints about WD SATAII drives not >working on IP35 boards at New Egg.... > >I don't have a great opinion of the Abit forum support posters. We >have 36 years of standards promoting PC parts interoperability. I >think hiding failures to comply with them is a disservice to ABit >customers as well as the PC community at large. I can just see the Mac >guy snickering. > >Hasta la Vista ABit, > >Stockdrover > >PS -I've been Asus/AMD powered for years. When I went looking for >Intel, I skipped Asus because they have been AMD/NVidia heavy for >years. I didn't think they'd play well with C2D and Intel Chipsets. I >was wrong, wrong, wrong. Asus rocks. > >E6850/P5E/cm2x1024-6400c4(*2)/WD1600YS(*3)/nx8600gt-t2d256ez/P180B/ >TP2-550/Raid5/Vista32 Meh. I have an IP35 Pro here and it runs great. Sadly, the Abit forum has a few anal-retentive quacks that birddog every post and spew bad advice. The IP35 Pro does have a problem with memory that requires > 2.0 volts to run properly, but to be honest those modules are running out of spec anyway so it's hard to fault Abit. IOW a reset causes the mobo's memory voltage to default to 1.8 (standard voltage) but if your module requires 2.1 to operate then you're pretty much screwed.
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 Prev: AW9D-Max and Intel Quad Core CPU's Next: KV8 Pro 3rd Eye stops at post code 52 |