From: David Miller on
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra(a)chello.nl>
Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2010 15:28:07 +0200

> This patch set tries to solve the local_irq_disable() vs NMI problem
> that SPARC has by providing new arch hooks and instrumenting the
> existing interface to WARN on conflicting usage.

Thanks Peter, looks good at first sight.

I'll toss together the sparc bits and give this a go.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
From: David Miller on
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra(a)chello.nl>
Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2010 15:28:07 +0200

> This patch set tries to solve the local_irq_disable() vs NMI problem
> that SPARC has by providing new arch hooks and instrumenting the
> existing interface to WARN on conflicting usage.

Ok, two patches coming.

One which adds the sparc64 irqflags.h methods.

And one which annotates the ftrace functions, as needed.

With this I have the function tracer working.

Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/