Prev: Why bother subtracting for local variables? (x86 c calling convention)
Next: I pee in the open
From: Rui Maciel on 9 Jul 2008 09:48
On Wed, 09 Jul 2008 03:36:25 -0700, Dustin Robert Kick wrote:

> No, no, you misunderstand, Jesus has a lot to say about assembly
> programming.

Indeed. The gospel of John starts off with "In the beginning, the Word
existed" for a good reason.


Rui Maciel
From: Frank Kotler on 9 Jul 2008 11:13
Rui Maciel wrote:
> On Wed, 09 Jul 2008 03:36:25 -0700, Dustin Robert Kick wrote:
>
>> No, no, you misunderstand, Jesus has a lot to say about assembly
>> programming.
>
> Indeed. The gospel of John starts off with "In the beginning, the Word
> existed" for a good reason.

No, no! We are explicitly commanded to work in binary! Matthew 5:37

"But let your communication be, Yea, yea; Nay, nay: for whatsoever is
more than these cometh of evil."

Best,
Frank

From: Michael Tippach on 25 Jul 2008 17:17
Robert Redelmeier wrote:

> Alternatively, only G-d can create "the word", we are
> commanded to use only binary lest we fall into evil.

I reckon that pretty much nails it!

*SCNR*

From: s_dubrovich on 26 Jul 2008 21:34
On Jul 9, 10:13 am, Frank Kotler <fbkot...(a)verizon.net> wrote:
> Rui Maciel wrote:
> > On Wed, 09 Jul 2008 03:36:25 -0700, Dustin Robert Kick wrote:
>
> >> No, no, you misunderstand, Jesus has a lot to say about assembly
> >> programming.
>
> > Indeed. The gospel of John starts off with "In the beginning, the Word
> > existed" for a good reason.
>
> No, no! We are explicitly commanded to work in binary! Matthew 5:37
>
> "But let your communication be, Yea, yea; Nay, nay: for whatsoever is
> more than these cometh of evil."
>
> Best,
> Frank

Hmm, 1100b := 12d Apostles. QED. I wrest your case!
Beware of the 'off by one' enigma, woe by judas.

Steve


 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: Why bother subtracting for local variables? (x86 c calling convention)
Next: I pee in the open