|
From: Ben Goldman on 11 Apr 2008 13:04 Glennbo wrote: > PC DAW X-Scaling Shootout - Part I : Nuendo v Reaper v Sonar > > http://www.dawbench.com/dawbenchdsp-x-scaling.htm > Great link . . . Philistine! ;) -- Cheers, Ben
From: Ben Goldman on 11 Apr 2008 13:22 Glennbo wrote: > In news:d5SdnaMVGNlABWLanZ2dnUVZ_hzinZ2d(a)centurytel.net the killer robot > Ben Goldman <not(a)thekitchen.org> grabbed the controls of the spaceship > cakewalk.audio and pressed these buttons... > >>> PC DAW X-Scaling Shootout - Part I : Nuendo v Reaper v Sonar >>> >>> http://www.dawbench.com/dawbenchdsp-x-scaling.htm >>> >> Great link . . . Philistine! ;) > > Hehe, without any benchmark tests, or number crunching of data, I could > easily tell, just by feel who has the most efficient audio engine. ;) > If my system gets overtaxed with a Sonar project that's down to an audio-only phase, I very likely will finish up using Reaper. It's impressive. Slightly sawed-off but impressive. Lean, mean, quick and clean eh? ;) -- Cheers, Ben
From: Max Arwood on 12 Apr 2008 18:26 Thanks for the info. I wish several parts of these apps was written in assembly! Disk i/o, the plugin i/o chain. It might be, but probably not. Max Arwood "Glennbo" <vdrumsYourHeadFromYourAss(a)cox.net> wrote in message news:Xns9A7D687C51024BrownShoesDontMakeIt(a)207.115.33.102... > > PC DAW X-Scaling Shootout - Part I : Nuendo v Reaper v Sonar > > http://www.dawbench.com/dawbenchdsp-x-scaling.htm > > -- > Remove YourHeadFromYourAss to Reply by email > ________ ____ > / ____/ /__ ____ ____ / __ )____ > / / __/ / _ \/ __ \/ __ \/ __ / __ \ > / /_/ / / __/ / / / / / / /_/ / /_/ / > \____/_/\___/_/ /_/_/ /_/_____/\____/ > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > Glennbo http://www.soundclick.com/glennbo > Non-Linear Sound http://www.soundclick.com/jambits > Hear My Music http://www.soundclick.com/ThePseudonyms
|
Pages: 1 Prev: EZ Ringtone Next: Monitoring while recording with Layla 24 - Max? <g> |