From: Paul Thomas on
On Mar 23, 5:35 pm, Salvatore <sfilipp...(a)uniroma2.it> wrote:

> I think it is valid, because I can see no reason why an additional USE
> layer should change the compliance...

The gfortran testsuite has recent testcases that are structured just
like that to test generic association via different routes (and one or
your OOP problems?). I forget which testcases they are.

Paul

From: Salvatore on
On 23 Mar, 17:56, Paul Thomas <paul.richard.tho...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mar 23, 5:35 pm, Salvatore <sfilipp...(a)uniroma2.it> wrote:
>
> > I think it is valid, because I can see no reason why an additional USE
> > layer should change the compliance...
>
> The gfortran testsuite has recent testcases that are structured just
> like that to test generic association via different routes (and one or
> your OOP problems?). I forget which testcases they are.
>
> Paul

I also opened another bug (not sure if it's a duplicate) involving
GENERICs
Salvatore