|
From: Jolly Roger on 20 Jun 2008 14:17 In article <howard-FF1335.10502520062008(a)newsgroups.comcast.net>, Howard S Shubs <howard(a)shubs.net> wrote: > In article <jollyroger-554AD0.10564111062008(a)individual.net>, > Jolly Roger <jollyroger(a)pobox.com> wrote: > > > > What that says to me, given that the current version is "Leopard" is > > > that there won't be many changes in the next rev and it can likely be > > > skipped. > > > > Huh?? I don't know where you get *that* idea. > > They named it after a minor variation on the same cat. Get real. -- Please send all responses to the relevant news group rather than directly to me, as E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my very hungry SPAM filter. Due to Google's refusal to prevent spammers from posting messages through their servers, I often ignore posts from Google Groups. You'll need to use a real news reader if you want me to see your posts. JR
From: Jolly Roger on 21 Jun 2008 05:07 In article <howard-61EC1A.00542221062008(a)newsgroups.comcast.net>, Howard S Shubs <howard(a)shubs.net> wrote: > In article <jollyroger-587472.13174620062008(a)individual.net>, > Jolly Roger <jollyroger(a)pobox.com> wrote: > > > In article <howard-FF1335.10502520062008(a)newsgroups.comcast.net>, > > Howard S Shubs <howard(a)shubs.net> wrote: > > > > > In article <jollyroger-554AD0.10564111062008(a)individual.net>, > > > Jolly Roger <jollyroger(a)pobox.com> wrote: > > > > > > > In article <howard-6B19C8.09500211062008(a)newsgroups.comcast.net>, > > > > Howard S Shubs <howard(a)shubs.net> wrote: > > > > > > > > > What that says to me, given that the current version is "Leopard" is > > > > > that there won't be many changes in the next rev and it can likely be > > > > > skipped. > > > > > > > > Huh?? I don't know where you get *that* idea. > > > > > > They named it after a minor variation on the same cat. > > > > Get real. > > You're saying that "Snow Leopard" isn't similar to "Leopard"? I'm not > seeing it. I'm saying that the fact that the name is similar doesn't indicate there won't be many changes or that it's not going to be worth upgrading. -- Please send all responses to the relevant news group rather than directly to me, as E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my very hungry SPAM filter. Due to Google's refusal to prevent spammers from posting messages through their servers, I often ignore posts from Google Groups. You'll need to use a real news reader if you want me to see your posts. JR
From: Jamie Kahn Genet on 21 Jun 2008 09:22 Howard S Shubs <howard(a)shubs.net> wrote: > In article <1iiegx0.1t2bmhe1hf51rkN%jamiekg(a)wizardling.geek.nz>, > jamiekg(a)wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) wrote: > > > Michelle Steiner <michelle(a)michelle.org> wrote: > > > > > Jobs said that the next version of Mac OS X will be named "Snow > > > Leopard", and that is all he said about it during his two-hour keynote > > > address at the Worldwide Developers Conference. Anything else about > > > will be in the actual sessions, which will all be under a DNA. But I'm > > > sure that there will be leaks as the week goes on. > > > > I was SURE this time it would be OS X Housecat! :-( > > That's what I was hoping for. With new functionality called "purr". LOL, and I'm sure don't need to tell you what the Trash will be renamed to ;-) -- If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.
From: Mike Rosenberg on 21 Jun 2008 11:19 Jolly Roger <jollyroger(a)pobox.com> wrote: > I'm saying that the fact that the name is similar doesn't indicate there > won't be many changes or that it's not going to be worth upgrading. Well, whether _any_ upgrade is "worth it" is one's opinion, based on whatever factors are important to you, but Snow Leopard differs from other Mac OS X upgrades in not adding lots of new features. -- I kill Google Groups posts. See http://improve-usenet.org for details. <http://designsbymike.net/shop/mac.cgi> Mac and geek T-shirts & gifts <http://designsbymike.net/shop/prius.cgi> Prius shirts/bumper stickers <http://designsbymike.net/shop/greet.cgi> Holiday cards with attitude
From: Jamie Kahn Genet on 21 Jun 2008 11:23 Mike Rosenberg <mikePOST(a)TOGROUPmacconsult.com> wrote: > Jolly Roger <jollyroger(a)pobox.com> wrote: > > > I'm saying that the fact that the name is similar doesn't indicate there > > won't be many changes or that it's not going to be worth upgrading. > > Well, whether _any_ upgrade is "worth it" is one's opinion, based on > whatever factors are important to you, but Snow Leopard differs from > other Mac OS X upgrades in not adding lots of new features. Features are not the value in Snow Leopard, and I can't wait for it! :-) I still wish they'd gone with OS X Housecat, though... *groumbles* -- If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 Prev: What is the unsubsidized price for the new 3G iPhone? Next: Spaces: I just don't get it... |